Suppr超能文献

非医生人员更改医嘱。

Alteration of physicians' orders by nonphysicians.

作者信息

Finn A F, Valenstein P N, Burke M D

机构信息

Department of Pathology, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-8691.

出版信息

JAMA. 1988 May 6;259(17):2549-52.

PMID:3258642
Abstract

We prospectively evaluated the accuracy with which clerical and laboratory staff carried out physicians' written orders for thyroid function testing in 181 patients at two institutions. In 54% of the patients studied, support staff were found to have added or deleted one or more tests from the original written orders. When the ordering physicians were asked to identify the clinical indications for the tests they had ordered, 37% of their orders either lacked an appropriate test or included an unnecessary test request. In contrast, after clerical and laboratory staff had changed orders, only 25% of patients had inappropriate tests performed or necessary tests omitted. Clerical staff using computer-based ordering menus significantly improved the appropriateness of physicians' orders compared with clerks who lacked such guidance. Laboratory technologists who used informal, knowledge-based rules also tended to improve the appropriateness of physicians' orders. We conclude that a substantial proportion of physicians' orders for diagnostic tests may be modified during the test requisitioning process. The use of testing regimens by ward clerks and laboratory technologists may explain their ability to improve on physicians' orders.

摘要

我们前瞻性地评估了两个机构中181名患者的文书人员和实验室工作人员执行医生书面甲状腺功能测试医嘱的准确性。在研究的54%的患者中,发现辅助人员对原始书面医嘱添加或删除了一项或多项检查。当要求开医嘱的医生确定他们所开检查的临床指征时,他们所开医嘱中有37%要么缺少适当的检查,要么包含不必要的检查请求。相比之下,在文书人员和实验室工作人员更改医嘱后,只有25%的患者接受了不适当的检查或遗漏了必要的检查。与没有此类指导的职员相比,使用基于计算机的医嘱菜单的文书人员显著提高了医生医嘱的适当性。使用非正式的、基于知识的规则的实验室技术人员也倾向于提高医生医嘱的适当性。我们得出结论,在检查申请过程中,医生开出的诊断检查医嘱中有很大一部分可能会被修改。病房职员和实验室技术人员使用检查方案可能解释了他们改进医生医嘱的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验