Amini-Parikhani Mahin, Ghaffarazad Amir, Soleimanpour Hassan, Ebrahimi-Bakhtavar Haniyeh, Rahmani Farzad
Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, East Azerbaijan, I. R, Tabriz, Iran.
Emergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, I. R, Tabriz, Iran.
Turk J Emerg Med. 2020 May 27;20(2):63-68. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.285011. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
This study aimed to determine the effect of adding intravenous midazolam to paracetamol in the treatment of patients with primary headache referring to the emergency department.
In a randomized clinical trial, 120 patients (18-65 years old) with primary headache referring to the emergency department were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups (case: paracetamol + midazolam and control: paracetamol + placebo), and the treatment was administered based on the treatment group. The severity of pain (according to the initial Visual Analog Scale) and at different times after the treatment onset (15, 30, and 60 min) and the degree of satisfaction with the treatment were compared in two groups of patients.
There were no statistically difference between the two groups about the median of pain severity at the time of 0 min (case: 8 vs. control: 8), 15 min (case: 6 vs. control: 6), and 30 min (case: 4 vs. control: 4) with > 0.05. Headache severity at 60 min after the treatment onset in the case group (median: 1) was less than that of the control group (median: 3). There was also a statistically significant difference in the median of patient satisfaction in the case group (case: 9 and control: 7 with < 0.001) and satisfaction in the case group was higher.
Based on our primary and secondary outcomes and the results of the study, we conclude that adding intravenous midazolam to paracetamol do not improve the therapeutic response ratio over time, but the effect of this intervention appeared after 1 h.
本研究旨在确定在急诊科就诊的原发性头痛患者治疗中,在对乙酰氨基酚中添加静脉注射咪达唑仑的效果。
在一项随机临床试验中,纳入了120名(18 - 65岁)到急诊科就诊的原发性头痛患者。患者被分为两组(病例组:对乙酰氨基酚 + 咪达唑仑;对照组:对乙酰氨基酚 + 安慰剂),并根据治疗组进行治疗。比较两组患者疼痛的严重程度(根据初始视觉模拟量表)、治疗开始后不同时间点(15、30和60分钟)以及对治疗的满意度。
两组在0分钟时疼痛严重程度的中位数(病例组:8 vs. 对照组:8)、15分钟时(病例组:6 vs. 对照组:6)和30分钟时(病例组:4 vs. 对照组:4)无统计学差异,P>0.05。治疗开始后60分钟时,病例组头痛严重程度(中位数:1)低于对照组(中位数:3)。病例组患者满意度中位数(病例组:9,对照组:7,P<0.001)也存在统计学显著差异,病例组满意度更高。
基于我们的主要和次要结局以及研究结果,我们得出结论,在对乙酰氨基酚中添加静脉注射咪达唑仑并不会随着时间的推移提高治疗有效率,但这种干预的效果在1小时后显现。