Suppr超能文献

普罗氯哌嗪与甲氧氯普胺用于急诊科偏头痛治疗的随机、安慰剂对照评估

Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for emergency department treatment of migraine headache.

作者信息

Coppola M, Yealy D M, Leibold R A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Darnall Army Community Hospital, Fort Hood, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;26(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70001-3.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the comparative efficacy of i.v. metoclopramide and prochlorperazine for the initial emergency department treatment of migraine headache.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Military community hospital ED with an annual census of 75,000.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy consenting adults from a convenience sample of patients presenting with migraine headache similar to that experienced in at least one prior episode. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, fever, signs of meningismus, altered sensorium, drug or alcohol use, oxygen saturation less than 90%, recent trauma or seizure, "worst headache," abnormal blood pressure, recent (within 48 hours) use of metoclopramide or prochlorperazine, and allergy to metoclopramide or prochlorperazine.

INTERVENTIONS

In a random manner, each subject received a 2-mL i.v. injection of identical-appearing fluid containing metoclopramide (10 mg), prochlorperazine (10 mg), or saline solution (placebo). No other analgesics or medications were administered during the initial study period; rescue agents were administered by the choice of the treating physician after all data were collected.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients scored their nausea, pain, and sedation before receiving the 2-mL injections and at 30 minutes after injection. Ten-centimeter nonhatched visual analog scales were used for these measurements, with distance from the left end (zero) calculated for each use. Clinically important successful treatment was defined a priori as achievement of the following criteria: patient satisfaction and either a decrease of 50% or more in the 30-minute pain score (compared with the initial score) or an absolute pain score of 2.5 cm or less. Failure to achieve these criteria constituted treatment failure. Differences between groups were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and chi 2 tests. Data are reported as frequency percentages and median values, with a two-tailed P value of .05 or less considered significant.

RESULTS

Nausea, pain, and sedation scores were similar in all three groups before therapy. Thirty minutes after treatment, pain scores differed among those treated with prochlorperazine (1.1 cm), with metoclopramide (3.9 cm), and with placebo (6.1 cm, P = .003). Clinical success occurred more commonly after treatment with prochlorperazine (82%) than after metoclopramide (46%) or placebo (29%, P = .03). However, metoclopramide and placebo scores did not differ (P = .14). Nausea tended to be improved after prochlorperazine, compared with metoclopramide or placebo, at 30 minutes (P = .64). Four patients (6%) returned to the ED for relapse of migraine headache within 24 hours (three in the placebo group and one in the metoclopramide group).

CONCLUSION

i.v. prochlorperazine relieves the headache and tends to improve nausea better than metoclopramide in ED patients with acute migraine headache.

摘要

研究目的

确定静脉注射甲氧氯普胺和异丙嗪用于急诊科偏头痛初始治疗的相对疗效。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

年就诊量为75000人的军队社区医院急诊科。

参与者

从便利样本中选取70名同意参与研究的成年人,这些患者患有偏头痛,且至少有过一次类似发作经历。排除标准包括妊娠、发热、脑膜刺激征迹象、意识改变、药物或酒精使用、氧饱和度低于90%、近期外伤或癫痫发作、“最严重头痛”、血压异常、近期(48小时内)使用过甲氧氯普胺或异丙嗪,以及对甲氧氯普胺或异丙嗪过敏。

干预措施

以随机方式,每位受试者接受2毫升外观相同的静脉注射,其中含甲氧氯普胺(10毫克)、异丙嗪(10毫克)或生理盐水(安慰剂)。在初始研究期间未给予其他镇痛药或药物;在收集完所有数据后,由主治医生选择给予救援药物。

测量指标

患者在接受2毫升注射前及注射后30分钟对恶心、疼痛和镇静程度进行评分。这些测量使用10厘米的无刻度视觉模拟量表,每次使用时计算从左端(零)开始的距离。临床上重要的成功治疗预先定义为达到以下标准:患者满意度,且30分钟疼痛评分(与初始评分相比)降低50%或更多,或绝对疼痛评分为2.5厘米或更低。未达到这些标准则构成治疗失败。使用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析和卡方检验分析组间差异。数据以频率百分比和中位数表示,双侧P值小于或等于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

治疗前,三组患者的恶心、疼痛和镇静评分相似。治疗后30分钟,接受异丙嗪治疗的患者疼痛评分为1.1厘米,接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者为3.9厘米,接受安慰剂治疗的患者为6.1厘米(P = 0.003)。与甲氧氯普胺(46%)或安慰剂(29%)相比,接受异丙嗪治疗后临床成功更为常见(82%,P = 0.03)。然而,甲氧氯普胺和安慰剂评分无差异(P = 0.14)。与甲氧氯普胺或安慰剂相比,30分钟时异丙嗪治疗后恶心倾向于改善(P = 0.64)。4名患者(6%)在24小时内因偏头痛复发返回急诊科(安慰剂组3名患者,甲氧氯普胺组1名患者)。

结论

对于急性偏头痛头痛的急诊科患者,静脉注射异丙嗪比甲氧氯普胺更能缓解头痛,且倾向于更好地改善恶心症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验