Suppr超能文献

在类风湿性关节炎患者中比较CELBESTA®与CELEBREX®的疗效和安全性:一项为期6周的多中心、双盲、双模拟、活性药物对照、随机、平行组、非劣效性4期临床试验。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial.

作者信息

Kim Hyun-Sook, Choi Won-Ho, Kim Bo Young, Kim Sung Soo, Lee Sang-Il, Kim Sang-Hyon, Choi Sung Jae, Kim Geun-Tae, Hur Jin-Wuk, Lee Myeung-Su, Kim Yun Sung, Hong Seung-Jae

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520931323. doi: 10.1177/0300060520931323.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® and CELEBREX® in patients with RA.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in self-assessed pain intensity determined using a 100-mm visual analog scale after 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

After a washout period, 119 eligible subjects were randomized to one of two groups (CELBESTA® group, n = 61; CELEBREX® group, n = 58). CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® because the upper limit of two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two groups (difference in the least square [LS] mean, -8.68 mm; two-sided 95% CI -16.59 mm to -0.77 mm) was less than the non-inferiority margin (10 mm). There were no significant differences in GI complications and renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® with regard to the pain relief efficacy in RA patients, and the tolerability and safety profiles were excellent and at similar levels for both preparations.

摘要

目的

塞来昔布是一种选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂,常用于降低类风湿关节炎(RA)患者胃肠道(GI)并发症的发生率。CELBESTA®是塞来昔布制剂CELEBREX®的仿制药。本研究比较了CELBESTA®和CELEBREX®在RA患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项多中心、双盲、双模拟、活性对照、随机、平行组、非劣效性临床试验。主要终点是治疗6周后使用100毫米视觉模拟量表自我评估的疼痛强度相对于基线的变化。

结果

经过洗脱期后,119名符合条件的受试者被随机分为两组之一(CELBESTA®组,n = 61;CELEBREX®组,n = 58)。CELBESTA®不劣于CELEBREX®,因为两组差异的双侧95%置信区间(CI)上限(最小二乘[LS]均值差异,-8.68毫米;双侧95%CI -16.59毫米至-0.77毫米)小于非劣效界值(10毫米)。胃肠道并发症和肾毒性方面无显著差异。

结论

在RA患者的疼痛缓解疗效方面,CELBESTA®不劣于CELEBREX®,且两种制剂的耐受性和安全性均良好且处于相似水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/7325469/447d952d19b3/10.1177_0300060520931323-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验