Choi In Ah, Baek Han-Joo, Cho Chul-Soo, Lee Yeon-Ah, Chung Won Tae, Park Young Eun, Lee Yun Jong, Park Yong-Beom, Lee Jisoo, Lee Shin-Seok, Yoo Wan-Hee, Song Jung-Soo, Kang Seong Wook, Kim Hyun Ah, Song Yeong Wook
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Nov 18;15:375. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-375.
Pelubiprofen is a prodrug of 2-arylpropionic acid with relatively selective effects on cyclooxygenase-2 activity. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of pelubiprofen with those of celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
This was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary end point was non-inferiority of pain decrease from baseline to week-6 as determined using a 100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS). Pelubiprofen was considered non-inferior to celecoxib if the lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval for treatment difference [(pain reduction in pelubiprofen group) - (pain reduction in celecoxib group)] was more than -10 mm. The secondary end points were as follows: non-inferiority of (1) reduction of Korean health assessment questionnaire (KHAQ) score; (2) decreased duration of morning stiffness; and (3) decrease in the frequency and total dose of rescue drugs after 6 weeks of treatment.
Seventy-seven patients in the pelubiprofen group and 68 patients in the celecoxib group started the study medication. Pelubiprofen was non-inferior to celecoxib with regard to reduction in VAS pain severity (difference, mean ± SD 5.0 ± 20.1; 97.5% CI, -2.3 to ∞). Pelubiprofen was also non-inferior to celecoxib in terms of the secondary end points, such as, decrease in KHAQ score (0.0 ± 0.5, 97.5% CI -0.2 to ∞), decrease in duration of morning stiffness (median 0.0 minute in both groups), and decrease in the frequency (0.7 ± 3.5, 97.5% CI -0.6 to ∞) and total amount (0.7 ± 3.6, 97.5% CI -0.6 to ∞) of rescue medication uses during the 6 week study period. Safety analysis revealed 31.2% patients in the pelubiprofen group and 20.6% patients in the celecoxib group experienced an adverse drug reaction (ADR). The frequency of gastrointestinal ADRs was 20.8 % and 8.8%, respectively.
Pelubiprofen was found to be as effective as celecoxib at pain reduction and for relieving stiffness in RA patients. However, more patients in the pelubiprofen group experienced ADR and the frequency of gastrointestinal ADRs was higher in the pelubiprofen group. ClinialTrials.gov identifier: NCT01781702.
培氯布洛芬是一种2-芳基丙酸前体药物,对环氧合酶-2活性具有相对选择性作用。本研究的目的是比较培氯布洛芬与塞来昔布在类风湿性关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项为期6周的多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组、III期非劣效性临床试验。主要终点是使用100mm疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)测定从基线到第6周疼痛减轻的非劣效性。如果治疗差异[(培氯布洛芬组疼痛减轻)-(塞来昔布组疼痛减轻)]的97.5%置信区间下限大于-10mm,则认为培氯布洛芬不劣于塞来昔布。次要终点如下:(1)韩国健康评估问卷(KHAQ)评分降低的非劣效性;(2)晨僵持续时间缩短;(3)治疗6周后急救药物使用频率和总剂量降低。
培氯布洛芬组77例患者和塞来昔布组68例患者开始使用研究药物。在减轻VAS疼痛严重程度方面,培氯布洛芬不劣于塞来昔布(差异,均值±标准差5.0±20.1;97.5%置信区间,-2.3至∞)。在次要终点方面,培氯布洛芬也不劣于塞来昔布,如KHAQ评分降低(0.0±0.5,97.5%置信区间-0.2至∞)、晨僵持续时间缩短(两组中位数均为0.0分钟)以及6周研究期间急救药物使用频率(0.7±3.5,97.5%置信区间-0.6至∞)和总量(0.7±3.6,97.5%置信区间-0.6至∞)降低。安全性分析显示,培氯布洛芬组31.2%的患者和塞来昔布组20.6%的患者发生药物不良反应(ADR)。胃肠道ADR的发生率分别为20.8%和8.8%。
发现培氯布洛芬在减轻类风湿性关节炎患者疼痛和缓解僵硬方面与塞来昔布同样有效。然而,培氯布洛芬组有更多患者发生ADR,且培氯布洛芬组胃肠道ADR的发生率更高。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01781702。