• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般开业医生报告在去除丧亲排除标准后应用 DSM 重性抑郁障碍标准。

General practitioners' reported application of DSM major depressive disorder criteria after removal of the bereavement exclusion criterion.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Deakin University School of Psychology, Geelong, Australia.

出版信息

Death Stud. 2022;46(3):764-771. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1782533. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1080/07481187.2020.1782533
PMID:32589099
Abstract

The removal of the bereavement exclusion criterion from major depressive disorder (MDD) in the 5th edition of generated concerns of over-diagnosing grief. Eight Australian General Practitioners (GPs) were interviewed to explore their application of MDD criteria to recently-bereaved individuals. Thematic analysis found GPs were unaware of the change and reluctant to apply MDD criteria two weeks post-bereavement. Depressive symptoms were viewed as natural grief, with diagnostic labels seen as unnecessary for patient-centered care. Our findings suggest new MDD criteria not being strictly applied by GPs, or no anticipated over-inflation of MDD diagnoses post-bereavement.

摘要

第五版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》取消了重大抑郁障碍(MDD)中的丧亲排除标准,这引发了对过度诊断悲伤的担忧。我们采访了 8 名澳大利亚全科医生,以探讨他们将 MDD 标准应用于最近丧亲的个体的情况。主题分析发现,全科医生并不了解这一变化,也不愿意在丧亲后两周内应用 MDD 标准。抑郁症状被视为自然悲伤,诊断标签被认为对以患者为中心的护理没有必要。我们的研究结果表明,全科医生没有严格应用新的 MDD 标准,或者预计在丧亲后不会过度增加 MDD 的诊断。

相似文献

1
General practitioners' reported application of DSM major depressive disorder criteria after removal of the bereavement exclusion criterion.一般开业医生报告在去除丧亲排除标准后应用 DSM 重性抑郁障碍标准。
Death Stud. 2022;46(3):764-771. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1782533. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Is DSM-IV bereavement exclusion for major depression relevant to treatment response? A case-control, prospective study.DSM-IV 对重度抑郁症丧亲之痛的排除是否与治疗反应相关?一项病例对照、前瞻性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;72(7):898-902. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05681blu. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
3
DSM-5: proposed changes to depressive disorders.DSM-5:抑郁障碍的拟议变更。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Mar;28(3):335-43. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.653436. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
4
On the criteria for diagnosing depression in bereaved individuals: a self-organizing map approach.在诊断丧亲个体抑郁的标准上:一种自组织图方法。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Mar 25;19(6):5380-5392. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022252.
5
The Medicalization of Bereavement: (Ab)normal Grief in the DSM-5.丧亲之痛的医学化:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中的(非)正常悲伤
Death Stud. 2015;39(6):347-52. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2014.951498. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
6
The removal of the bereavement exclusion in the DSM-5: exploring the evidence.DSM-5 中丧亲排除的去除:探索证据。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Nov;15(11):413. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0413-0.
7
Bereavement related and non-bereavement related depressions: a comparative field study.丧亲相关抑郁与非丧亲相关抑郁:一项比较性实地研究。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan;112(1-3):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.016. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
8
Bereavement and depression: possible changes to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: a report from the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Association for Death Education and Counseling.丧亲与抑郁:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》可能的修订:死亡教育与咨询协会科学顾问委员会的报告。
Omega (Westport). 2011;63(3):199-220. doi: 10.2190/OM.63.3.a.
9
The Grief Debate, the DSM, and Clinical Practice.《悲伤之辩》、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》与临床实践
J Psychiatr Pract. 2024 Jul 1;30(4):292-296. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000792.
10
Does bereavement-related major depression differ from major depression associated with other stressful life events?与丧亲相关的重度抑郁症与与其他应激性生活事件相关的重度抑郁症有区别吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;165(11):1449-55. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111757. Epub 2008 Aug 15.