• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丧亲之痛的医学化:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中的(非)正常悲伤

The Medicalization of Bereavement: (Ab)normal Grief in the DSM-5.

作者信息

Bandini Julia

机构信息

a Department of Sociology , Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts , USA.

出版信息

Death Stud. 2015;39(6):347-52. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2014.951498. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1080/07481187.2014.951498
PMID:25906168
Abstract

This article examines the recently published changes to eliminate the bereavement exclusion (BE) from the criteria for the diagnosis of major depression in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5). Numerous scholars and critics have expressed concerns by calling these changes a "medicalization" of grief. This article first considers the removal of the BE and then examines the macrolevel and microlevel consequences of this medicalization of grief, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment, a potential expanded market for pharmaceutical companies, and the loss of traditional and cultural methods of adapting to the loss of a loved one.

摘要

本文探讨了近期发布的对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)第五版中重度抑郁症诊断标准的修改,以消除丧亲排除条款(BE)。众多学者和批评者对这些修改表示担忧,称其为悲伤的“医学化”。本文首先考虑了BE的去除,然后审视了悲伤医学化在宏观和微观层面的后果,包括过度诊断和过度治疗、制药公司潜在的市场扩大,以及适应亲人离世的传统和文化方法的丧失。

相似文献

1
The Medicalization of Bereavement: (Ab)normal Grief in the DSM-5.丧亲之痛的医学化:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中的(非)正常悲伤
Death Stud. 2015;39(6):347-52. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2014.951498. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
2
DSM-5: proposed changes to depressive disorders.DSM-5:抑郁障碍的拟议变更。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Mar;28(3):335-43. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.653436. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
3
Seeking Legitimacy for DSM-5: The Bereavement Exception as an Example of Failed Process.寻求《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的合理性:以丧亲之痛例外情况为例看其失败的过程。
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):192-198. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor2-1702.
4
Is DSM-IV bereavement exclusion for major depression relevant to treatment response? A case-control, prospective study.DSM-IV 对重度抑郁症丧亲之痛的排除是否与治疗反应相关?一项病例对照、前瞻性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;72(7):898-902. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05681blu. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
5
Grief and Major Depression—Controversy Over Changes in DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria.悲伤与重度抑郁症——关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版诊断标准变化的争议
Am Fam Physician. 2014 Nov 15;90(10):690, 694.
6
General practitioners' reported application of DSM major depressive disorder criteria after removal of the bereavement exclusion criterion.一般开业医生报告在去除丧亲排除标准后应用 DSM 重性抑郁障碍标准。
Death Stud. 2022;46(3):764-771. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1782533. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
7
Grief, depression, and the DSM-5.悲伤、抑郁与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版
J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 Sep;19(5):386-96. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000435037.91049.2f.
8
The Grief Debate, the DSM, and Clinical Practice.《悲伤之辩》、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》与临床实践
J Psychiatr Pract. 2024 Jul 1;30(4):292-296. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000792.
9
[Bereavement and complicated grief: towards a definition of Prolonged Grief Disorder for DSM-5].[丧亲之痛与复杂性哀伤:迈向《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中持续性哀伤障碍的定义]
Riv Psichiatr. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):106-14. doi: 10.1708/1551.16903.
10
Bereavement and depression: possible changes to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: a report from the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Association for Death Education and Counseling.丧亲与抑郁:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》可能的修订:死亡教育与咨询协会科学顾问委员会的报告。
Omega (Westport). 2011;63(3):199-220. doi: 10.2190/OM.63.3.a.

引用本文的文献

1
Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and -5-TR: Challenges and controversies.《ICD-11 与 -5-TR 中的延长哀伤障碍:挑战与争议》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):944-951. doi: 10.1177/00048674231154206. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Managing the moral expansion of medicine.管理医学的道德扩张。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Sep 22;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00836-2.
3
Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder.
国际疾病分类第11版中选定新类别(复杂创伤后应激障碍、持续性悲伤障碍、游戏障碍和强迫性性行为障碍)的新经验。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):189-213. doi: 10.1002/wps.20960.
4
Psychiatrization of Society: A Conceptual Framework and Call for Transdisciplinary Research.社会的精神医学化:一个概念框架及跨学科研究的呼吁
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 4;12:645556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645556. eCollection 2021.
5
Challenges and Strategies for Current Classifications of Depressive Disorders: Proposal for Future Diagnostic Standards.抑郁障碍现行分类面临的挑战与策略:未来诊断标准建议。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1305:103-116. doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-6044-0_7.
6
Supporting bereavement and complicated grief in primary care: a realist review.初级保健中对丧亲之痛和复杂性哀伤的支持:一项现实主义综述
BJGP Open. 2021 Jun 30;5(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0008. Print 2021 Jun.
7
Diagnostic Issues of Depressive Disorders from Kraepelinian Dualism to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.从克雷佩林二元论到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的抑郁症诊断问题
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Sep;16(9):636-644. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.09.07. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
8
Grief, Mindfulness and Neural Predictors of Improvement in Family Dementia Caregivers.悲伤、正念与家庭痴呆症照料者改善情况的神经预测因素
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 14;13:155. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00155. eCollection 2019.
9
Overdiagnostic uncertainty.过度诊断的不确定性。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;32(6):533-534. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0260-0. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.医学化与过度诊断:不同却又相似。
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Jun;19(2):253-64. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9693-6.