Ørke Elisabeth Christie, Bjørkly Stål, Vatnar Solveig Karin Bø
Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Molde University College, Norway.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):NP1988-NP2011. doi: 10.1177/0886260520933037. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Empirical knowledge regarding risk factors for intimate partner violence (IPV) from multiple partners (MP) is scarce and sought by clinicians and many women themselves for the prevention of future intimate partner violence relationships (IPVRs). Quantitative data were obtained through a structured interview with a stratified sample of help-seeking women ( = 154) with no ( = 48, 0IPVR), one ( = 55, 1IPVR), or multiple ( = 51, 2IPVR) IPVRs. This study investigated the association between (a) childhood family violence, (b) other childhood adversities, (c) victimization and perpetration of IPV in the last (index) relationship, and (d) controlling sociodemographic and contextual variables, and the following dependent variables: (a) women with 1IPVR and 2IPVR compared with 0IPVR and (b) women with 1IPVR compared with 2IPVR. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that, compared with nonvictimized women, IPV victimized women were nearly three times more likely to report childhood sexual abuse. They also reported a higher frequency of peer victimization and a higher likelihood of having an immigrant partner. In addition, the length of the index relationship was shorter for IPV victimized women. Compared with women with 1IPVR, women with IPV by MP were more likely to report childhood emotional abuse and less education, and they were less likely to be immigrants. The two groups of IPV victimized women were indistinguishable regarding characteristics of victimization and perpetration of IPV. This study indicated that there were other risk factors for IPV by MP than for IPV in general and highlighted the importance of addressing parenting and emotional care in IPV families.
关于来自多个伴侣的亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）风险因素的实证知识稀缺，临床医生和许多女性自身都在探寻此类知识，以预防未来的亲密伴侣暴力关系（IPVR）。通过对有寻求帮助的女性进行分层抽样的结构化访谈获取了定量数据，这些女性有过无亲密伴侣暴力关系（n = 48，0次IPVR）、一段亲密伴侣暴力关系（n = 55，1次IPVR）或多段亲密伴侣暴力关系（n = 51，2次IPVR）。本研究调查了以下因素之间的关联：（a）童年时期的家庭暴力，（b）其他童年逆境，（c）上一段（索引）关系中亲密伴侣暴力的受害和施暴情况，以及（d）控制社会人口学和背景变量，与以下因变量的关系：（a）有1次IPVR和2次IPVR的女性与无亲密伴侣暴力关系的女性相比，以及（b）有1次IPVR的女性与有两次IPVR的女性相比。多变量逻辑回归分析表明，与未遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性相比，遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性报告童年性虐待的可能性几乎高出三倍。她们还报告了更高频率的同伴受害情况以及拥有移民伴侣的可能性更高。此外，遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的索引关系持续时间更短。与有1次IPVR的女性相比，遭受多个伴侣亲密伴侣暴力的女性更有可能报告童年情感虐待且受教育程度更低，并且她们作为移民的可能性更小。两组遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性在亲密伴侣暴力的受害和施暴特征方面没有差异。本研究表明，除了一般亲密伴侣暴力的风险因素外，多个伴侣的亲密伴侣暴力还存在其他风险因素，并强调了在亲密伴侣暴力家庭中解决养育和情感关怀问题的重要性。
