Buckley Christopher T, Van Matre Edward T, Fischer Peter E, Minard Gayle, Dickerson Roland N
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Union University, College of Pharmacy, Jackson, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;36(1):212-218. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10546. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Patients with traumatic brain (TBI) injury often require a high dosage of propofol, which can provide an excessive caloric intake. We evaluated our strategy of using liquid protein supplement boluses concurrently with high protein-containing enteral nutrition (EN) formulas and formula rate reduction to avoid caloric overfeeding and inadequate protein intake.
Adult patients (aged >17 years) with TBI admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (TICU) who received concurrent propofol and EN were retrospectively reviewed. Caloric intakes from propofol and EN were obtained. Actual protein intake was compared with projected protein intakes from high protein content and standard protein content enteral formulas when given at an isocaloric intake.
Fifty-one patients were enrolled. Average caloric intake from propofol was 356 ± 243 kcal/d or 5 ± 3 kcal/kg/d (range, <1-15 kcal/kg/d). Daily EN caloric intake ranged from 7 ± 4 kcal/kg/d (day 2) to 16 ± 9 kcal/kg/d (day 5; P < .001). Average protein intake ranged from 0.6 ± 0.4 g/kg/d (day 2) to 1.5 ± 0.7 g/kg/d (day 5; P < .001). The modified EN strategy resulted in daily delivery of 24%-38% more protein than an isocaloric regimen with a high protein-content formula and twice as much protein than the standard protein-content formula (P < .001).
The strategy of providing an EN regimen comprised liquid protein boluses, and high and very high protein-containing EN formulas at a reduced rate improved protein delivery without caloric overfeeding.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者通常需要高剂量的丙泊酚,这可能会导致热量摄入过多。我们评估了在使用含高蛋白的肠内营养(EN)配方并降低配方输注速率的同时给予液体蛋白补充剂推注的策略,以避免热量摄入过多和蛋白质摄入不足。
对入住创伤重症监护病房(TICU)且同时接受丙泊酚和EN的成年TBI患者(年龄>17岁)进行回顾性研究。获取丙泊酚和EN的热量摄入。将实际蛋白质摄入量与等热量摄入时高蛋白含量和标准蛋白含量肠内配方的预计蛋白质摄入量进行比较。
共纳入51例患者。丙泊酚的平均热量摄入为356±243千卡/天或5±3千卡/千克/天(范围,<1-15千卡/千克/天)。每日EN热量摄入范围为7±4千卡/千克/天(第2天)至16±9千卡/千克/天(第5天;P<.001)。平均蛋白质摄入量范围为0.6±0.4克/千克/天(第2天)至1.5±0.7克/千克/天(第5天;P<.001)。改良的EN策略导致每日蛋白质输送量比使用高蛋白含量配方的等热量方案多24%-38%,比标准蛋白含量配方多两倍(P<.00)。
提供包含液体蛋白推注、降低速率的高蛋白质和极高蛋白质含量EN配方的EN方案的策略,可在不导致热量摄入过多的情况下改善蛋白质输送。