Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者中肾脏病膳食改良试验和慢性肾脏病流行病学协作公式的诊断价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic value of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520925950. doi: 10.1177/0300060520925950.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations are common for calculating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Unlike CKD, the key pathological change of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is glomerulosclerosis.

METHODS

To conduct a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations in diabetic patients, we searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing standard GFR (sGFR) with eGFR using these two equations.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies of 7192 diabetic patients reporting data on bias or accuracy were included. At the study level, both equations underestimated eGFR. CKD-EPI was more accurate in studies with mean GFR ≥60 mL/minute/1.73 m. At the individual level, both equations overestimated GFR by 6.38 mL/minute/1.73 m (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.67-10.1) and 7.65 mL/minute/1.73 m (95% CI 2.78-12.52), respectively, for sGFR < 90 mL/minute/1.73 m. The CKD-EPI equation was 7.61% (95% CI 4.66-10.56) more accurate in subjects with sGFR > 90 mL/minute/1.73 m. The CKD-EPI equation performed poorly in diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The CKD-EPI equation can be used to estimate GFR in patients with incipient DKD, but has drawbacks. Improved eGFR equations suitable for diabetic populations are needed.

摘要

背景

慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)和肾脏病饮食改良试验(MDRD)方程常用于估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。与 CKD 不同,糖尿病肾病(DKD)的关键病理改变是肾小球硬化。

方法

为了对 CKD-EPI 和 MDRD 方程在糖尿病患者中的诊断性能进行荟萃分析,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library,以查找比较这两种方程与标准肾小球滤过率(sGFR)的研究。

结果

纳入了 13 项研究,共 7192 例糖尿病患者,这些研究报告了关于偏倚或准确性的数据。在研究水平上,两种方程都低估了 eGFR。在平均肾小球滤过率≥60ml/min/1.73m2 的研究中,CKD-EPI 方程更准确。在个体水平上,两种方程都高估了 sGFR<90ml/min/1.73m2 的患者的肾小球滤过率,分别为 6.38ml/min/1.73m2(95%置信区间[CI] 2.67-10.1)和 7.65ml/min/1.73m2(95%CI 2.78-12.52)。对于 sGFR>90ml/min/1.73m2 的患者,CKD-EPI 方程的准确性为 7.61%(95%CI 4.66-10.56)。在糖尿病患者中,CKD-EPI 方程的性能较差。

结论

CKD-EPI 方程可用于估算早期 DKD 患者的肾小球滤过率,但存在缺陷。需要开发适合糖尿病人群的改良 eGFR 方程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3012/7436805/d09273c424a1/10.1177_0300060520925950-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验