Fanard L, Van Steenberge A, Demeire X, van der Puyl F
Department of Anaesthesia, Clinique Ste-Anne, Brussels, Belgium.
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:87-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09082.x.
Propofol (25 patients) or midazolam (25 patients) was used to provide sedation in patients who underwent abdominal or orthopaedic surgery under epidural anaesthesia after intravenous premedication with droperidol 1 mg and fentanyl 20 micrograms. The quality of sedation whilst the block was performed, was assessed as good in 19 patients after propofol 1.49 mg/kg but six patients exhibited uncontrolled movement. Good sedation was provided in 22 patients after midazolam 3 mg. A mean infusion rate of propofol of 1.74 mg/kg/hour resulted in easily controllable sedation during the procedure. Eleven patients given midazolam required no further sedation but a mean of 5.79 mg was needed in the remaining 14 patients; the dose was unpredictable in individual patients. Recovery was significantly more rapid in the propofol group.
在静脉注射1毫克氟哌利多和20微克芬太尼进行术前用药后,接受硬膜外麻醉下腹部或骨科手术的患者中,25例使用丙泊酚、25例使用咪达唑仑进行镇静。在使用1.49毫克/千克丙泊酚后,19例患者在进行阻滞时镇静质量被评估为良好,但6例患者出现不受控制的运动。使用3毫克咪达唑仑后,22例患者获得良好镇静。丙泊酚平均输注速率为1.74毫克/千克/小时,在手术过程中产生易于控制的镇静效果。11例接受咪达唑仑的患者无需进一步镇静,但其余14例患者平均需要5.79毫克;个体患者的剂量不可预测。丙泊酚组的恢复明显更快。