Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Sep;31(9):1747-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04385-3. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
This case presents the work-up and management of a patient requesting surgical intervention for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after previous excision of a portion of her midurethral sling because of mesh exposure. Four international experts provide their approach to this complex case. There is little consensus regarding further surgery in a patient who has required mesh excision. Treatment by fascial sling was commonly considered and the literature review outlines the pros and cons of autologous fascia versus donor fascia for this specific case.
本病例介绍了一位患者的诊疗经过,该患者因网片暴露而先前切除了部分中段尿道吊带,现因复发性压力性尿失禁要求手术干预。四位国际专家提供了他们对这一复杂病例的处理方法。对于已经切除网片的患者,进一步手术的共识很少。筋膜吊带治疗通常被认为是可行的,文献综述概述了在这种特殊情况下使用自体筋膜与异体筋膜的优缺点。