Suppr超能文献

调Q开关Nd:YAG(532纳米)激光与皮内注射氨甲环酸治疗面部雀斑:一项半脸、随机、对照试验

Q-Switched Nd:YAG (532 nm) Laser Versus Intra-Dermal Tranexamic Acid for Treatment of Facial Ephelides: A Split Face, Randomized, Comparative Trial.

作者信息

Sayed Khadiga S, Tuqan Samar, Hilal Rana F

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Mar;53(3):324-332. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23291. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of intradermal injection of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus Q switched (QS) KTP (532 nm) in the treatment of facial ephelides.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized comparative split-face study included a total of 30 female patients with bilateral facial ephelides. One cheek was treated by intra-dermal TXA injections and the other was treated by QS-KTP (532 nm). Patient assessment was performed by photography, pigmentation area, severity index and spectrophotometry at baseline, 1 week after treatment, and 2 months after treatment.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between both sides regarding the percentage change of pigmentation area, severity score (PSI) and melanin index (MI) after treatment and during follow up, favoring laser (P = 0.001). PSI decreased after treatment by 66.5% and 15.4% (laser and TXA sides respectively), further decrease after follow-up was 69.4% with laser and 26.1% with TXA. MI improved by 3.7% after KTP laser to 7.7% after follow-up and by 2.4% after TXA injections to 6.5% after follow-up. Four patients developed post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation following QS-KTP.

CONCLUSION

QS-KTP laser is superior to intradermal TXA injection in the treatment of facial ephelides. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

摘要

背景与目的

比较皮内注射氨甲环酸(TXA)与调Q开关(QS)倍频Nd:YAG(532 nm)激光治疗面部雀斑的疗效和安全性。

研究设计/材料与方法:一项随机对照半脸研究,共纳入30例双侧面部有雀斑的女性患者。一侧脸颊采用皮内注射TXA治疗,另一侧采用QS-KTP(532 nm)激光治疗。在基线、治疗后1周和治疗后2个月,通过拍照、色素沉着面积、严重程度指数和分光光度法对患者进行评估。

结果

治疗后及随访期间,两侧在色素沉着面积变化百分比、严重程度评分(PSI)和黑色素指数(MI)方面存在显著差异,激光治疗组更具优势(P = 0.001)。治疗后PSI分别下降66.5%(激光治疗侧)和15.4%(TXA注射侧),随访后激光治疗组进一步下降69.4%,TXA注射组下降26.1%。KTP激光治疗后MI改善3.7%,随访后改善至7.7%;TXA注射后MI改善2.4%,随访后改善至6.5%。4例患者在QS-KTP激光治疗后出现炎症后色素沉着。

结论

在治疗面部雀斑方面,QS-KTP激光优于皮内注射TXA。激光外科医学。© 2020威利期刊有限责任公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验