• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干 PCI 中不同病变准备策略对结局的影响:EXCEL 试验。

Impact of lesion preparation strategies on outcomes of left main PCI: The EXCEL trial.

机构信息

Columbia University Division of Cardiology at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA.

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29116. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29116
PMID:32592450
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined outcomes according to lesion preparation strategy (LPS) in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the EXCEL trial.

BACKGROUND

The optimal LPS for LMCA PCI is unclear.

METHODS

We categorized LPS hierarchically (high to low) as: (a) rotational atherectomy (RA); (b) cutting or scoring balloon (CSB); (c) balloon angioplasty (BAL); and d) direct stenting (DIR). The primary endpoint was 3-year MACE; all-cause death, stroke, or myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Among 938 patients undergoing LMCA PCI, RA was performed in 6.0%, CSB 9.5%, BAL 71.3%, and DIR 13.2%. In patients treated with DIR, BAL, CSB, and RA, respectively, there was a progressive increase in SYNTAX score, LMCA complex bifurcation, trifurcation or calcification, number of stents, and total stent length. Any procedural complication occurred in 10.4% of cases overall, with the lowest rate in the DIR (7.4%) and highest in the RA group (16.1%) (p  = .22). There were no significant differences in the 3-year rates of MACE (from RA to DIR: 17.9%, 20.2%, 14.5%, 14.7%; p = .50) or ischemia-driven revascularization (from RA to DIR: 16.8%, 10.8%, 12.3%, 14.2%; p = .65). The adjusted 3-year rates of MACE did not differ according to LPS.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparable 3-year outcomes suggest that appropriate lesion preparation may be able to overcome the increased risks of complex LMCA lesion morphology.

摘要

目的

我们在 EXCEL 试验中检查了左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中根据病变准备策略(LPS)的结果。

背景

LMCA PCI 的最佳 LPS 尚不清楚。

方法

我们分层(从高到低)对 LPS 进行分类:(a)旋磨术(RA);(b)切割或切割球囊(CSB);(c)球囊血管成形术(BAL);和(d)直接支架置入术(DIR)。主要终点是 3 年 MACE;全因死亡、卒中和心肌梗死。

结果

在 938 例接受 LMCA PCI 的患者中,RA 占 6.0%,CSB 占 9.5%,BAL 占 71.3%,DIR 占 13.2%。在接受 DIR、BAL、CSB 和 RA 治疗的患者中,SYNTAX 评分、LMCA 复杂分叉、三叉或钙化、支架数量和总支架长度均逐渐增加。总体上任何手术并发症发生率为 10.4%,其中 DIR 组发生率最低(7.4%),RA 组发生率最高(16.1%)(p  = .22)。3 年 MACE 发生率无显著差异(从 RA 到 DIR:17.9%、20.2%、14.5%、14.7%;p  = .50)或缺血驱动血运重建(从 RA 到 DIR:16.8%、10.8%、12.3%、14.2%;p  = .65)。LPS 对调整后的 3 年 MACE 发生率没有影响。

结论

可比的 3 年结果表明,适当的病变准备可能能够克服复杂 LMCA 病变形态增加的风险。

相似文献

1
Impact of lesion preparation strategies on outcomes of left main PCI: The EXCEL trial.左主干 PCI 中不同病变准备策略对结局的影响:EXCEL 试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):24-32. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29116. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
2
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
3
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
5
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
6
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
7
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
8
The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的现状。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 Jan 17;20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0705-2.
9
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: Two-stent versus one-stent Strategy for Comparison of 6-month MACE.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉分叉病变:双支架与单支架策略比较6个月主要不良心血管事件
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Sep;30(9):894-899. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.09.894.
10
Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting According to Lesion Site: Results From the EXCEL Trial.根据病变部位比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的结果:EXCEL 试验结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1224-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Bail-Out Techniques in Percutaneous Intervention for Ellis Grade III Coronary Perforation in Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions.左主干远端分叉病变中 Ellis Ⅲ级冠状动脉穿孔经皮介入治疗中的补救技术
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 11;2(3):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100609. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
2
Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Extremely Calcified Left Main Lesions.极重度左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 23;59(5):825. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050825.
3
The Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
急性心肌梗死患者旋磨术的手术及临床结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 18;9:846564. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.846564. eCollection 2022.