• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄。

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.

机构信息

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jul-Aug;63(4):482-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.007
PMID:32592707
Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality in adults, and symptoms typically develops in adulthood. In the majority of cases, BAV disease progresses with age and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is performed with excellent operative outcomes. Based on a series of randomized trials, transcatheter AVR (TAVR) has evolved from a novel technology to an established therapy for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) regardless of risk profile. Despite exclusion of bicuspid anatomy from the randomized trials, an increasing number of patients with BAV-AS have been treated with TAVR. Recent observational studies showed the comparable outcomes of TAVR between bicuspid and tricuspid AS. However, worse outcomes in patients with unfavorable bicuspid anatomy such as calcified raphe plus excessive leaflet calcification have raised concerns for TAVR in younger and lower risk population. For the further expansion of TAVR toward BAV-AS population, we need randomized trials of TAVR in this population. Until then, previous registry data combined with computed tomographic-based anatomical assessment may guide the optimal therapy in patients with bicuspid anatomy.

摘要

二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)是成人中最常见的先天性心脏异常,其症状通常在成年后出现。在大多数情况下,BAV 疾病随年龄增长而进展,且大多数患者行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的手术效果极佳。基于一系列随机试验,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已从一项新技术发展为有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的既定治疗方法,无论风险状况如何。尽管随机试验排除了二叶式解剖结构,但越来越多的 BAV-AS 患者接受了 TAVR 治疗。最近的观察性研究表明,在二叶式和三叶式 AS 患者中,TAVR 的结果相当。然而,在瓣叶钙化嵴和瓣叶过度钙化等不利二叶式解剖结构的患者中,预后更差,这使得人们对 TAVR 在年轻和低危人群中的应用产生了担忧。为了将 TAVR 进一步扩展至 BAV-AS 人群,我们需要在该人群中进行 TAVR 的随机试验。在此之前,结合基于计算机断层扫描的解剖评估的先前登记数据可能有助于指导二叶式解剖结构患者的最佳治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jul-Aug;63(4):482-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: where do we stand?经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄:我们目前的进展如何?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Jun;59(3):381-391. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10350-8. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with first- and new-generation bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶主动脉瓣狭窄的第一代和第二代生物瓣:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;298:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
5
Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic stenosis - a systematic review of existing literature.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的疗效——对现有文献的系统评价
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec;17(6):579-585. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1391692. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.二叶式主动脉瓣形态与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;76(9):1018-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.005.
7
Differences in metabolic profiles between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的代谢谱差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 18;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01491-4.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in bicuspid compared to trileaflet aortic valves.与三叶主动脉瓣相比,二叶主动脉瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Jan;20(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):1043-1061. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048048. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10
A Bicuspid Aortic Valve Imaging Classification for the TAVR Era.经导管主动脉瓣置换术时代的二叶式主动脉瓣影像学分类。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;9(10):1145-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.022. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological properties of valve materials using RGD and EC.使用RGD和EC的瓣膜材料的生物学特性。
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Sep 4;20(1):20251195. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1195. eCollection 2025.
2
The Evolving Role of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Valvular Procedures.经导管瓣膜手术时代外科主动脉瓣置换术的角色演变
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):5299. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165299.
3
Technical Success after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid versus Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的技术成功率
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 1;12(1):343. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010343.
4
Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用自膨式瓣膜治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02943-9.
5
Subclinical Leaflets Thrombosis After Transcatheter Replacement of Bicuspid vs. Tricuspid Aortic Valve.经导管置换二尖瓣与三尖瓣主动脉瓣后亚临床瓣叶血栓形成
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 22;8:790069. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.790069. eCollection 2021.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Insufficiency After Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.保留主动脉根部瓣膜置换术后经导管主动脉瓣置换治疗二叶式主动脉瓣关闭不全
JACC Case Rep. 2021 Dec 1;3(17):1798-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.07.018.