Vyas Preeti, Tulsawani Raj Kumar, Vohora Divya
Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Defense Institute of Physiology & Allied Science, Defense Research and Development Organization, New Delhi, India.
Neuroscience. 2020 Aug 21;442:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
The evidences from various studies show the association of peripheral and neuronal inflammation with complex pathophysiology of status epilepticus (SE). In this view, the present work attempted to develop a model of neuronal inflammation mediated SE by combining both epileptic and inflammatory components of the disease and also to mimic SE co-morbid with systemic inflammation by peripheral administration of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) 2 h prior to the pilocarpine (PILO) induction in C57BL/6 mice. We evaluated the anti-convulsant and neuroprotective effects of 7-day prophylactic treatment with three conventional anti-epileptic drugs (Sodium valproate, SVP 300 mg/kg p.o.; Carbamazepine CBZ 100 mg/kg p.o.; Levetiracetam; LEV 200 mg/kg p.o.) of widespread clinical use. Morris water maze and Rota rod tests were carried out 24-h post-exposure to evaluate the neurobehavioral co-morbidities associated with neuroinflammation-mediated status epilepticus. Upon priming with LPS, the loss of protection against PILO-induced seizures was observed by SVP and CBZ, however, LEV showed protection by delaying the seizures. Dramatic elevation in the seizure severity and neuronal loss demonstrated the possible pro-convulsant effect of LPS in the PILO model. Also, the decreased cytokine levels by the AEDs showed their association with NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and TGF-β pathways in PILO model. The loss of protective activities of SVP and CBZ in LPS+PILO model was due to increased cytokine levels associated with over-activation of neuroinflammatory pathways, however, partial efficacy of LEV is possibly due to association of other neuroinflammatory mechanisms. The current work provides direct evidence of the contribution of increased peripheral and neuronal inflammation in seizures via regulation of inflammatory pathways in the brain.
来自各项研究的证据表明,外周炎症和神经元炎症与癫痫持续状态(SE)复杂的病理生理学相关。基于此观点,本研究试图通过结合该疾病的癫痫和炎症成分来建立一种神经元炎症介导的SE模型,并且通过在C57BL/6小鼠中毛果芸香碱(PILO)诱导前2小时外周给予脂多糖(LPS)来模拟与全身炎症共病的SE。我们评估了三种临床广泛使用的传统抗癫痫药物(丙戊酸钠,SVP 300 mg/kg口服;卡马西平CBZ 100 mg/kg口服;左乙拉西坦LEV 200 mg/kg口服)进行7天预防性治疗的抗惊厥和神经保护作用。暴露后24小时进行莫里斯水迷宫和转棒试验,以评估与神经炎症介导的癫痫持续状态相关的神经行为共病。在用LPS预处理后,观察到SVP和CBZ对PILO诱导的癫痫发作失去保护作用,然而,LEV通过延迟癫痫发作显示出保护作用。癫痫发作严重程度和神经元损失的显著升高表明LPS在PILO模型中可能具有促惊厥作用。此外,抗癫痫药物降低细胞因子水平表明它们与PILO模型中的NF-κB、IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α和TGF-β途径相关。SVP和CBZ在LPS+PILO模型中保护活性的丧失是由于与神经炎症途径过度激活相关的细胞因子水平升高,然而,LEV的部分疗效可能归因于其他神经炎症机制。目前的研究工作提供了直接证据,表明外周和神经元炎症增加通过调节大脑中的炎症途径对癫痫发作有影响。