• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较乳腺癌雌激素受体、孕激素受体和 HER2-neu 免疫组化结果与 Oncotype Dx 的结果。

Comparison of Estrogen receptors, Progesterone receptors and HER2-neu immunohistochemistry results in breast cancer with those of Oncotype Dx.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Aug;47:151556. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151556. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151556
PMID:32592992
Abstract

Oncotype Dx (ODx) recurrence score (RS) is used in early breast cancer to guide the use of adjuvant therapy. In addition to RS the test produces results of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of Estrogen receptors (ER), Progesterone receptors (PgR) and Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2-neu). Our goal was to determine the correlation between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT-PCR testing of ER, PgR and HER2-neu and to correlate the results of ODx RS with tumors' grade, age and PgR status. 113 patients with ER+, HER2-neu- breast cancers that underwent ODx testing were analyzed for receptors correlation and concordance rates by the 2 methods. A total of 104 patients had ER+/PgR+ tumors and 9 patients had ER+/PgR- tumors by IHC, the average RS were 17.5 ± 9.1 and 31.2 ± 8.7 (P < 0.001) respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient between IHC and ODx results were 0.5 (95% CI 0.34-0.62) for ER and 0.78 (95% CI 0.7-0.84) for PgR. The concordance rate between IHC and ODx was 98.2% for ER, 89.4%.for PgR and 99.1% for HER2-neu. Most of the discordant cases (9 out of 13) were low positive (1-10%) by IHC and negative by RT-PCR. In addition higher tumor grade was associated with a higher ODx RS. Our data show that the IHC results were highly concordant with RT-PCR for ER, PgR and Her2-neu. In addition low positive (1-10%) ER/PgR might indicate a real negative status. Our study shows that ER+/PgR- breast cancers are associated with a significantly higher ODx RS.

摘要

Oncotype DX(ODx)复发评分(RS)用于早期乳腺癌以指导辅助治疗的应用。除了 RS,该测试还产生雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PgR)和人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2-neu)逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的结果。我们的目标是确定 ER、PgR 和 HER2-neu 的免疫组织化学(IHC)和 RT-PCR 检测之间的相关性,并将 ODx RS 的结果与肿瘤的分级、年龄和 PgR 状态相关联。分析了 113 例接受 ODx 检测的 ER+、HER2-neu-乳腺癌患者,以比较两种方法的受体相关性和一致性率。通过 IHC,共有 104 例患者为 ER+/PgR+肿瘤,9 例患者为 ER+/PgR-肿瘤,平均 RS 分别为 17.5±9.1 和 31.2±8.7(P<0.001)。IHC 与 ODx 结果的 Spearman 相关系数分别为 ER 0.5(95%置信区间 0.34-0.62)和 PgR 0.78(95%置信区间 0.7-0.84)。ER 的 IHC 与 ODx 一致性率为 98.2%,PgR 为 89.4%,HER2-neu 为 99.1%。大多数不一致病例(13 例中有 9 例)IHC 为低阳性(1-10%),而 RT-PCR 为阴性。此外,肿瘤分级越高,ODx RS 越高。我们的数据表明,IHC 结果与 ER、PgR 和 Her2-neu 的 RT-PCR 高度一致。此外,低阳性(1-10%)ER/PgR 可能表明真正的阴性状态。我们的研究表明,ER+/PgR-乳腺癌与 ODx RS 显著升高相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Estrogen receptors, Progesterone receptors and HER2-neu immunohistochemistry results in breast cancer with those of Oncotype Dx.比较乳腺癌雌激素受体、孕激素受体和 HER2-neu 免疫组化结果与 Oncotype Dx 的结果。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Aug;47:151556. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151556. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.常规免疫组织化学/原位杂交与 Oncotype DX qRT-PCR 检测乳腺癌生物标志物状态的一致性,并对其不相符的情况进行了调查,该研究共纳入了 591 例病例。
Hum Pathol. 2020 Oct;104:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
3
Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.比较常规免疫组化和 FISH 研究与 Oncotype DX 检测的乳腺生物标志物状态,一项 610 例病例的研究。
Breast J. 2018 Nov;24(6):889-893. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13110. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?在去除 HER2 阳性和低雌激素受体表达的患者后,Oncotype DX 复发评分(RS)是否具有预后价值?
Breast J. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):357-64. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12126. Epub 2013 May 23.
5
In ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancers, HER2 mRNA Levels Correlate Better with Clinicopathologic Features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score than HER2 Immunohistochemistry.在雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的乳腺癌中,与HER2免疫组化相比,HER2 mRNA水平与临床病理特征及Oncotype DX复发评分的相关性更好。
Lab Invest. 2024 Mar;104(3):100309. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100309. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.雌激素受体和孕激素受体免疫组化和 HER2 FISH 检测与 Oncotype DX 检测:对乳腺癌治疗的影响。
Breast J. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):37-45. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12223. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
7
Relevance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemical staining to Oncotype DX recurrence score.孕激素受体免疫组化染色与Oncotype DX复发评分的相关性。
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2016 Jun;9(2):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Correlation between modified Magee equation-2 and Oncotype-Dx recurrence scores using both traditional and TAILORx cutoffs and the clinical application of the Magee Decision Algorithm: a single institutional review.使用传统和TAILORx临界值的改良Magee方程-2与Oncotype-Dx复发评分之间的相关性以及Magee决策算法的临床应用:一项单机构回顾
Breast Cancer. 2021 Mar;28(2):321-328. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01163-3. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
9
Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer.免疫组织化学与 RT-qPCR 检测评估乳腺癌患者 ER、PR、HER2 和 Ki67 及亚型的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Aug;194(3):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06649-6. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer.免疫组织化学与聚合酶链反应在评估乳腺癌雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和Ki-67以及预测病理完全缓解方面的比较
BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3111-1.