Martin David P, Delaney James J, Bacon Douglas R
Professor of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Professor of Philosophy, Niagara University, Lewiston, New York.
J Anesth Hist. 2020 Jun;6(2):74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.janh.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Sunday February 24, 1957 was a pivotal day in the history of anesthesiology and pain medicine. The leader of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Pius XII met with anesthesiologists attending an international symposium sponsored by the Italian Society of Anesthesiologists entitled, "Anesthesia and the Human Personality". The purpose of this audience was to seek clarification about the use of opioids at the end of life to reduce suffering. Three questions had been formulated from the previous year's Italian Congress of Anesthesiologists and sent to the Holy See on this specific issue. The Pope responded during this audience remarking that there was no moral obligation to withhold pain medication that could elevate suffering. He further remarked that the suppression of consciousness that can occur with opioids was consistent with the spirit of the Christian gospels. Finally, he also stated that it was not morally objectionable to administer opioids even if it might shorten life. The moral philosophy behind these answers is the doctrine of double effect. In essence, administering medications to relieve pain, the primary effect, may also hasten death, the unintended secondary effect. In seeking answers to these questions, the Italian anesthesiologists were at the forefront of a larger and ongoing debate. As new therapies are developed that may have unintended consequences, when it is morally permissible to use them?
1957年2月24日,星期日,是麻醉学和疼痛医学史上的关键一天。罗马天主教会领袖庇护十二世教皇会见了参加由意大利麻醉医师协会主办的题为“麻醉与人类人格”的国际研讨会的麻醉医师。这次会面的目的是寻求关于在生命末期使用阿片类药物以减轻痛苦的相关问题的澄清。从去年的意大利麻醉医师大会上提出了三个关于这个特定问题的问题,并发送给了梵蒂冈教廷。教皇在这次会面中回应称,没有道德义务 withhold 能够加剧痛苦的止痛药物。他还指出,阿片类药物可能导致的意识抑制与基督教福音书的精神是一致的。最后,他还表示,即使使用阿片类药物可能会缩短生命,在道德上也并非不可接受。这些回答背后的道德哲学是双重效应原则。本质上,给药以缓解疼痛,这是主要效果,也可能加速死亡,这是意想不到的次要效果。在寻求这些问题的答案时,意大利麻醉医师处于一场更大且仍在进行的辩论的前沿。随着可能产生意想不到后果的新疗法的发展,在道德上何时允许使用它们呢?
原文中“withhold”未翻译完整,推测此处可能是“不给予”之类的意思,因原文不完整,所以译文在这部分表述稍显模糊。