Kister Tobias, Wagner Robert, Rommel Karl Philipp, Blazek Stephan, Kinzel Peter, Grothoff Matthias, Gutberlet Matthias, Thiele Holger, Dähnert Ingo, Riede Frank-Thomas, Lurz Philipp
Heart Center Leipzig at University Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Germany.
Heart Center Leipzig at University Leipzig, Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;321:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
Pathophysiological differences in relief of pulmonary stenosis (PS) as opposed to pulmonary regurgitation (PR) by percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) remain elusive, but might impact current assessment of procedural success and ultimately indications.
Invasive pressure measurements, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and cardiopulmonary exercise testing were performed before pre-stenting (BMS), after BMS and after PPVI in patients with either PS or PR.
In PS (n = 14), BMS reduced the right ventricular (RV) to systemic pressure ratio (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 0.1%; p < .01), improved RF EF (53 ± 14 vs. 59 ± 12%; p = .01) but introduced free PR (PR fraction post 39 ± 12%; p < .01) with no changes in effective RV stroke volume (SV). PPVI eliminated PR (PR fraction 5 ± 3%; p < .01) and improved effective RV SV (p < .01) with no changes in RV EF (p = .47). Peak VO2 improved significantly after BMS, with no changes following PPVI (26 ± 9 vs. 30 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 10 ml/kgmin). In PR (n = 14), BMS exaggerated PR (PR fraction post 47 ± 10) with reduction in effective RV SV (pre 43 ± 9 vs. post 38 ± 8 ml/m; p = .01), which improved after PPVI (post PPVI 49 ± 9 ml/m; p < .01), secondary to elimination of PR (PR fraction 5 ± 4%; p < .01). RV EF (pre 53 ± 11 vs. post 53 ± 9 vs. post PPVI 50 ± 9%) and Peak VO2 (pre 22 ± 7 vs. post 21 ± 7 vs. post PPVI 23 ± 7 ml/kgmin) remained unchanged.
Exercise capacity in patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction is primarily afterload-dependent.
经皮肺动脉瓣植入术(PPVI)缓解肺动脉狭窄(PS)与肺动脉反流(PR)的病理生理差异仍不明确,但可能影响当前对手术成功的评估及最终的适应症。
对患有PS或PR的患者在预扩张支架置入前(BMS)、BMS后及PPVI后进行有创压力测量、心脏磁共振成像和心肺运动试验。
在PS患者中(n = 14),BMS降低了右心室(RV)与体循环压力比值(0.8±0.2对0.4±0.1%;p <.01),改善了右心室射血分数(RF EF)(53±14对59±12%;p =.01),但引入了游离PR(39±12%;p <.01),有效右心室每搏量(SV)无变化。PPVI消除了PR(PR分数5±3%;p <.01),改善了有效右心室SV(p <.01),右心室EF无变化(p =.47)。BMS后峰值VO2显著改善,PPVI后无变化(26±9对30±11对31±10 ml/kgmin)。在PR患者中(n = 14),BMS使PR加重(PR分数47±10),有效右心室SV降低(术前43±9对术后38±8 ml/m;p =.01),PPVI后改善(PPVI后49±9 ml/m;p <.01),这是由于PR消除(PR分数5±4%;p <.01)。右心室EF(术前53±11对术后53±9对PPVI后50±9%)和峰值VO2(术前22±7对术后21±7对PPVI后23±7 ml/kgmin)保持不变。
右心室流出道功能障碍患者的运动能力主要取决于后负荷。