数字接触者追踪、隐私和公共卫生。
Digital Contact Tracing, Privacy, and Public Health.
出版信息
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):43-46. doi: 10.1002/hast.1131.
Abstract
Digital contact tracing, in combination with widespread testing, has been a focal point for many plans to "reopen" economies while containing the spread of Covid-19. Most digital contact tracing projects in the United States and Europe have prioritized privacy protections in the form of local storage of data on smartphones and the deidentification of information. However, in the prioritization of privacy in this narrow form, there is not sufficient attention given to weighing ethical trade-offs within the context of a public health pandemic or to the need to evaluate safety and effectiveness of software-based technology applied to public health.
摘要
数字接触者追踪，结合广泛的测试，一直是许多计划“重新开放”经济同时控制新冠病毒传播的重点。在美国和欧洲，大多数数字接触者追踪项目都优先考虑通过在智能手机上存储数据和对信息进行去识别化来保护隐私。然而，在这种狭隘形式的隐私优先考虑中，没有充分关注在公共卫生大流行的背景下权衡道德权衡，也没有充分关注评估应用于公共卫生的基于软件的技术的安全性和有效性的必要性。
相似文献
1
Digital Contact Tracing, Privacy, and Public Health.数字接触者追踪、隐私和公共卫生。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):43-46. doi: 10.1002/hast.1131.
2
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪：隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.
3
Digital contact tracing for COVID-19.新冠病毒病的数字接触者追踪
CMAJ. 2020 Jun 15;192(24):E653-E656. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200922. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
COVID-19 Contact Tracing and Data Protection Can Go Together.新冠接触者追踪和数据保护可以并行不悖。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 20;8(4):e19359. doi: 10.2196/19359.
5
Digital Smartphone Tracking for COVID-19: Public Health and Civil Liberties in Tension.用于新冠疫情的数字智能手机追踪：公共卫生与公民自由陷入紧张关系
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2371-2372. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8570.
6
What's next for COVID-19 apps? Governance and oversight.新冠病毒应用程序的下一步是什么？治理与监督。
Science. 2020 Nov 13;370(6518):760-762. doi: 10.1126/science.abd9006.
7
Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic.利用手机应用程序进行即时接触者追踪以控制 COVID-19 大流行的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):427-431. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106314. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Information Technology-Based Tracing Strategy in Response to COVID-19 in South Korea-Privacy Controversies.韩国应对新冠疫情的基于信息技术的追踪策略——隐私争议
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2129-2130. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6602.
9
Contact Tracing to Manage COVID-19 Spread-Balancing Personal Privacy and Public Health.接触者追踪以管理新冠病毒传播——平衡个人隐私与公共卫生
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jul;95(7):1320-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.031. Epub 2020 May 3.
10
Privacy in the Coronavirus Era.新冠疫情时代的隐私问题。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2020 Sep;24(9):535-536. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2020.29055.sjt. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.非经验方法在医学、医疗保健和公共卫生领域数字技术伦理研究中的应用：系统期刊评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Short- and Long-Term Predicted and Witnessed Consequences of Digital Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.新冠疫情期间数字监控的短期和长期预测及见证后果：范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 24;10:e47154. doi: 10.2196/47154.
3
Normative positions towards COVID-19 contact-tracing apps: findings from a large-scale qualitative study in nine European countries.对新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的规范性立场：来自九个欧洲国家的大规模定性研究结果
Crit Public Health. 2021 Jun 2;32(1):5-18. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2021.1925634. eCollection 2022.
4
Use of digital technologies for public health surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.COVID-19大流行期间数字技术在公共卫生监测中的应用：一项范围综述
Digit Health. 2023 May 17;9:20552076231173220. doi: 10.1177/20552076231173220. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
The impact of commercial health datasets on medical research and health-care algorithms.商业健康数据集对医学研究和医疗保健算法的影响。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e288-e294. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00025-0.
6
Using passive Wi-Fi for community crowd sensing during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间利用被动式Wi-Fi进行社区人群感知。
J Big Data. 2023;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40537-022-00675-3. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Explaining citizens' resistance to use digital contact tracing apps: A mixed-methods study.解释公民对使用数字接触者追踪应用程序的抵触情绪：一项混合方法研究。
Int J Inf Manage. 2022 Apr;63:102468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102468. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
8
Mobile Sensing in the COVID-19 Era: A Review.COVID-19 时代的移动传感：综述
Health Data Sci. 2022 Aug 8;2022:9830476. doi: 10.34133/2022/9830476. eCollection 2022.
9
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-19.追踪应用程序技术：COVID-19 时代的伦理审查及 COVID-19 后发展方向
Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(3):30. doi: 10.1007/s10676-022-09659-6. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
10
The value of social interactions and incentives on the use of a digital contact tracing tool post COVID-19 lockdown in Singapore.新冠疫情封锁后新加坡使用数字接触者追踪工具中社会互动和激励措施的价值。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16820-0.
本文引用的文献
1
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.临床试验参与者对数据共享风险和收益的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 7;378(23):2202-2211. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1713258.
Zotero 插件