Suppr超能文献

诱发不良生物公民行为。

Provoking Bad Biocitizenship.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50 Suppl 1:S23-S29. doi: 10.1002/hast.1152.

Abstract

Mirroring the set of questions explored in the special report in which this essay appears and through a critical Cree standpoint, this essay poses three provocations intended to upend habits of thought relative to notions of goodness, biocitizenship, and the democratization of scientific pursuit. Styled as foreplay, the essay warms the reader up to the desirable possibility of being a bad biocitizen. I briefly establish the colonial conditions under which the fields of genomic science, biomedical research, and bioethics have been made possible. I then offer Indigenous Science, Technology, and Society as an alternative project aimed at disturbing the territorial, political, and morally inflected claims of nation-states and their citizens, research institutions and their researchers, and bioeconomies and their consumers to continue to possess Indigenous territories and to study Indigenous bodies while controlling the bioethical principles, protocols, and policies for doing so. The work of Indigenous STS seeks to break down the bounded knowledges of disciplinary reason and map the networked interrelations of problems inhibiting and solutions strengthening the empowerment of Indigenous peoplehoods.

摘要

本文通过克里批判视角,回应了本文所呈现的特刊中探讨的一系列问题,提出了三个具有挑战性的观点,旨在颠覆关于善良、生物公民身份和科学追求民主化的思维习惯。本文以性前嬉行为为框架,旨在让读者对成为不良生物公民的可能性感到愉悦。我简要介绍了基因组科学、生物医学研究和生物伦理学得以产生的殖民条件。然后,我提出了“原住民科学、技术与社会”,作为一种替代方案,旨在挑战民族国家及其公民、研究机构及其研究人员以及生物经济及其消费者继续拥有原住民领土并在控制生物伦理原则、协议和政策的情况下研究原住民身体的领土、政治和道德主张。原住民 STS 的工作旨在打破学科理性的封闭性知识,并绘制出阻碍和加强原住民赋权的问题的网络化相互关系图。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验