University of Massachusetts Boston.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Oct 1;45(5):847-861. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8543310.
The growing need for long-term services and supports (LTSS) poses significant challenges to both individuals and government. This article documents the continuing failure to tackle this problem at the national level-a failure that was most recently seen in the fallout from the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which included the single piece of national legislation ever enacted to comprehensively address LTSS costs: the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act. The CLASS Act was passed as part of the ACA (Title 8) but was repealed in 2013. Following its demise, policy experts and some Democrats have made additional proposals for addressing the LTSS financing crisis. Moreover, significant government action is taking place at the state level, both to relieve financial and emotional burdens on LTSS recipients and their families and to ease pressure on state Medicaid budgets. Lessons from these initiatives could serve as opportunities for learning how to overcome roadblocks to successful policy development, adoption, and implementation across states and for traversing the policy and political tradeoffs should a policy window once again open for addressing the problem of LTSS financing nationally.
长期服务和支持(LTSS)的需求不断增长,给个人和政府都带来了重大挑战。本文记录了在国家层面上未能解决这一问题的持续失败——这一失败在最近的《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的后果中可见一斑,该法案包括了有史以来第一部全面解决 LTSS 成本的国家立法:社区生活援助服务和支持(CLASS)法案。CLASS 法案作为 ACA 的一部分获得通过(第 8 章),但于 2013 年被废除。该法案失效后,政策专家和一些民主党人提出了更多解决 LTSS 融资危机的建议。此外,州一级也在采取重大的政府行动,以减轻 LTSS 接受者及其家庭的经济和情感负担,并缓解州医疗补助预算的压力。这些举措的经验教训可以为学习如何克服成功制定、采用和实施政策的障碍提供机会,同时也可以为在全国范围内解决 LTSS 融资问题的政策窗口再次打开时进行政策和政治权衡提供机会。