• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19:现在是长期服务和支持、医疗保健系统以及公共卫生之间合作的时刻。

COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University.

Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco and Trinity College Dublin.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):565-594. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12500
PMID:33590920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8014270/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Policy Points To address systemic problems amplified by COVID-19, we need to restructure US long-term services and supports (LTSS) as they relate to both the health care systems and public health systems. We present both near-term and long-term policy solutions. Seven near-term policy recommendations include requiring the uniform public reporting of COVID-19 cases in all LTSS settings; identifying and supporting unpaid caregivers; bolstering protections for the direct care workforce; increasing coordination between public health departments and LTSS agencies and providers; enhancing collaboration and communication across health, LTSS, and public health systems; further reducing barriers to telehealth in LTSS; and providing incentives to care for vulnerable populations. Long-term reform should focus on comprehensive workforce development, comprehensive LTSS financing reform, and the creation of an age-friendly public health system.

CONTEXT

The heavy toll of COVID-19 brings the failings of the long-term services and supports (LTSS) system in the United States into sharp focus. Although these are not new problems, the pandemic has exacerbated and amplified their impact to a point that they are impossible to ignore. The primary blame for the high rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths has been assigned to formal LTSS care settings, specifically nursing homes. Yet other systemic problems have been unearthed during this pandemic: the failure to coordinate the US public health system at the federal level and the effects of long-term disinvestment and neglect of state- and local-level public health programs. Together these failures have contributed to an inability to coordinate with the LTSS system and to act early to protect residents and staff in the LTSS care settings that are hotspots for infection, spread, and serious negative health outcomes.

METHODS

We analyze several impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US LTSS system and policy arrangements. The economic toll on state budgets has been multifaceted, and the pandemic has had a direct impact on Medicaid, the primary funder of LTSS, which in turn has further exacerbated the states' fiscal problems. Both the inequalities across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status as well as the increased burden on unpaid caregivers are clear. So too is the need to better integrate LTSS with the health, social care, and public health systems.

FINDINGS

We propose seven near-term actions that US policymakers could take: implementing a uniform public reporting of COVID-19 cases in LTSS settings; identifying and supporting unpaid caregivers; bolstering support for the direct care workforce; increasing coordination between public health departments and LTSS agencies and providers; enhancing collaboration and communication across health, LTSS, and public health systems; further reducing the barriers to telehealth in LTSS; and providing incentives to care for our most vulnerable populations. Our analysis also demonstrates that our nation requires comprehensive reform to build the LTSS system we need through comprehensive workforce development, universal coverage through comprehensive financing reform, and the creation of an age-friendly public health system.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 has exposed the many deficits of the US LTSS system and made clear the interdependence of LTSS with public health. Policymakers have an opportunity to address these failings through a substantive reform of the LTSS system and increased collaboration with public health agencies and leaders. The opportunity for reform is now.

摘要

目的

为了解决因 COVID-19 而加剧的系统性问题,我们需要对美国长期服务和支持(LTSS)进行重构,使其与医疗保健系统和公共卫生系统相关联。我们提出了近期和长期的政策解决方案。近期的七项政策建议包括:要求所有 LTSS 场所统一公开报告 COVID-19 病例;确定并支持无偿护理人员;支持直接护理人员;加强公共卫生部门与 LTSS 机构和提供者之间的协调;加强卫生、LTSS 和公共卫生系统之间的协作和沟通;进一步减少 LTSS 中远程医疗的障碍;为弱势群体提供护理激励。长期改革应侧重于全面的劳动力发展、全面的 LTSS 融资改革以及创建一个适合老龄化的公共卫生系统。

背景

COVID-19 的沉重代价使美国长期服务和支持(LTSS)系统的缺陷成为焦点。尽管这些问题并不是新问题,但大流行加剧并放大了它们的影响,以至于这些问题不容忽视。COVID-19 感染和死亡的高发病率主要归咎于正规 LTSS 护理机构,特别是疗养院。然而,在这次大流行期间,还发现了其他系统性问题:未能在联邦一级协调美国公共卫生系统,以及长期投资不足和忽视州和地方一级公共卫生计划的影响。这些失败共同导致无法与 LTSS 系统协调,无法及早采取行动保护 LTSS 护理机构的居民和工作人员,这些机构是感染、传播和严重负面健康后果的热点。

方法

我们分析了 COVID-19 大流行对美国 LTSS 系统和政策安排的几个影响。对州预算的经济影响是多方面的,大流行对 Medicaid 产生了直接影响, Medicaid 是 LTSS 的主要资金来源,这反过来又进一步加剧了各州的财政问题。种族、族裔和社会经济地位之间的不平等以及无偿护理人员负担的加重都是显而易见的。同样需要更好地将 LTSS 与卫生、社会护理和公共卫生系统整合。

结果

我们提出了美国政策制定者可以采取的七项近期行动:在 LTSS 场所实施 COVID-19 病例的统一公开报告;确定并支持无偿护理人员;支持直接护理人员;加强公共卫生部门与 LTSS 机构和提供者之间的协调;加强卫生、LTSS 和公共卫生系统之间的协作和沟通;进一步减少 LTSS 中远程医疗的障碍;为我们最脆弱的人群提供护理激励。我们的分析还表明,我们的国家需要通过全面的劳动力发展、通过全面的融资改革实现全面覆盖以及创建一个适合老龄化的公共卫生系统来对 LTSS 系统进行全面改革。

结论

COVID-19 暴露了美国 LTSS 系统的许多缺陷,并清楚地表明 LTSS 与公共卫生之间的相互依存关系。政策制定者有机会通过实质性的 LTSS 系统改革和加强与公共卫生机构和领导者的合作来解决这些问题。改革的机会就在现在。

相似文献

1
COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.COVID-19:现在是长期服务和支持、医疗保健系统以及公共卫生之间合作的时刻。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):565-594. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Addressing Long-Term Services and Supports Reform via Medicare. Yes, Medicare, That Post-Acute Care Program.通过医疗保险解决长期服务和支持改革。是的,医疗保险,那个急性后期护理计划。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Mar-Apr;32(2):108-124. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1563469. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
3
Emergency Flexibility for States to Increase and Maintain Medicaid Eligibility for LTSS under COVID-19.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,各州可灵活调整扩大并维持长期护理服务 Medicaid 资格的政策。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):343-349. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1774312. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Long-term care financing: lessons from France.长期护理融资:法国的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):359-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12125.
5
Long-Term Services and Supports for Older Adults: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.老年人长期护理和支持:美国医师学院立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Aug;175(8):1172-1174. doi: 10.7326/M22-0864. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
An Assessment of State-Led Reform of Long-Term Services and Supports.对由国家主导的长期服务与支持改革的评估
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Jun;40(3):531-74. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2888460. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Financing long-term services and supports: challenges, goals, and needed reforms.长期服务和支持的融资:挑战、目标和所需的改革。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):209-226. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462680. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
The Role of Place in Person- and Family-Oriented Long-Term Services and Supports.地方在面向个人和家庭的长期服务和支持中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1076-1138. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12664. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
9
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.社区长期服务与支持:迈向研究议程。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Right-restricting measures implemented by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol.公共卫生监测服务机构在新冠疫情期间实施的右限制措施:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e096904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096904.
2
Consumer-Directed Personal Care in the New York Metropolitan Area: Trends in Use From 2017 to 2022.纽约大都会区的消费者导向型个人护理:2017年至2022年的使用趋势
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 May;26(5):105535. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105535. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Unveiling the impact: understanding long-term care workers' experiences and their perceptions of resident challenges amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.揭示影响:了解长期护理工作者在新冠疫情期间的经历及其对居民所面临挑战的看法。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05656-0.
4
A qualitative interview study of care home managers' experiences of medicines optimisation for residents with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于护理院管理人员在新冠疫情期间为痴呆症患者优化用药经历的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e091645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091645.
5
Addressing infection prevention and control in Alabama through the long-term care strike team.通过长期护理应急小组解决阿拉巴马州的感染预防与控制问题。
J Infect Prev. 2024 Sep;25(5):198-201. doi: 10.1177/17571774241239782. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Factors influencing long-term care facility performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.新冠疫情期间影响长期护理机构绩效的因素:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):901. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11331-2.
7
A regional learning health system of congregate care facilities for COVID-19 response.一个用于应对新冠疫情的集中照护设施区域学习型健康系统。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Jan 24;8(3):e10407. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10407. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Nurses' Experiences of Care in Portuguese Nursing Homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus Group Study.护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间在葡萄牙养老院的护理体验:焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 11;20(16):6563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166563.
9
Ready, set, go! The role of organizational readiness to predict adoption of a family caregiver training program using the Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory.各就各位,预备,跑!运用罗杰斯创新扩散理论,组织准备度在预测家庭护理员培训项目采用情况中的作用。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jun 19;4(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00447-x.
10
COVID-19 pandemic in long-term care: An international perspective for policy considerations.长期护理机构中的新冠疫情:政策考量的国际视角
Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Apr;10(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
What Federalism Means for the US Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019.联邦制对美国应对2019冠状病毒病意味着什么。
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 May 1;1(5):e200510. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0510.
2
Reimagining Nursing Homes in the Wake of COVID-19.新冠疫情后对养老院的重新构想。
NAM Perspect. 2020 Sep 21;2020. doi: 10.31478/202009a. eCollection 2020.
3
Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act With Use of Long-term Care.平价医疗法案下医疗补助扩张与长期护理使用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2018728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18728.
4
Severe Staffing And Personal Protective Equipment Shortages Faced By Nursing Homes During The COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,养老院面临严重的人员配备和个人防护设备短缺问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1812-1821. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01269. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
5
Moving Toward a Global Age-Friendly Ecosystem.迈向全球老龄化友好型生态系统
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):1936-1940. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16675. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
6
Financial Vulnerability and Worker Well-Being: A Comparison of Long-Term Services and Supports Workers With Other Health Workers.财务脆弱性与工人福祉:长期服务和支持工作者与其他卫生工作者的比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):607-615. doi: 10.1177/1077558720930131. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
7
Characteristics of U.S. Nursing Homes with COVID-19 Cases.有新冠病例的美国养老院的特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1653-1656. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16661. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Long-Term Care Policy after Covid-19 - Solving the Nursing Home Crisis.新冠疫情后的长期护理政策——解决养老院危机
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 3;383(10):903-905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2014811. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Disparities in the Population at Risk of Severe Illness From COVID-19 by Race/Ethnicity and Income.按种族/族裔和收入划分的新冠重症风险人群差异
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):137-139. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Creating an Age-Friendly Public Health System.创建一个对老年人友好的公共卫生系统。
Innov Aging. 2020 Jan 1;4(1):igz044. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz044. eCollection 2020.