Suppr超能文献

COVID-19:现在是长期服务和支持、医疗保健系统以及公共卫生之间合作的时刻。

COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University.

Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco and Trinity College Dublin.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):565-594. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Policy Points To address systemic problems amplified by COVID-19, we need to restructure US long-term services and supports (LTSS) as they relate to both the health care systems and public health systems. We present both near-term and long-term policy solutions. Seven near-term policy recommendations include requiring the uniform public reporting of COVID-19 cases in all LTSS settings; identifying and supporting unpaid caregivers; bolstering protections for the direct care workforce; increasing coordination between public health departments and LTSS agencies and providers; enhancing collaboration and communication across health, LTSS, and public health systems; further reducing barriers to telehealth in LTSS; and providing incentives to care for vulnerable populations. Long-term reform should focus on comprehensive workforce development, comprehensive LTSS financing reform, and the creation of an age-friendly public health system.

CONTEXT

The heavy toll of COVID-19 brings the failings of the long-term services and supports (LTSS) system in the United States into sharp focus. Although these are not new problems, the pandemic has exacerbated and amplified their impact to a point that they are impossible to ignore. The primary blame for the high rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths has been assigned to formal LTSS care settings, specifically nursing homes. Yet other systemic problems have been unearthed during this pandemic: the failure to coordinate the US public health system at the federal level and the effects of long-term disinvestment and neglect of state- and local-level public health programs. Together these failures have contributed to an inability to coordinate with the LTSS system and to act early to protect residents and staff in the LTSS care settings that are hotspots for infection, spread, and serious negative health outcomes.

METHODS

We analyze several impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US LTSS system and policy arrangements. The economic toll on state budgets has been multifaceted, and the pandemic has had a direct impact on Medicaid, the primary funder of LTSS, which in turn has further exacerbated the states' fiscal problems. Both the inequalities across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status as well as the increased burden on unpaid caregivers are clear. So too is the need to better integrate LTSS with the health, social care, and public health systems.

FINDINGS

We propose seven near-term actions that US policymakers could take: implementing a uniform public reporting of COVID-19 cases in LTSS settings; identifying and supporting unpaid caregivers; bolstering support for the direct care workforce; increasing coordination between public health departments and LTSS agencies and providers; enhancing collaboration and communication across health, LTSS, and public health systems; further reducing the barriers to telehealth in LTSS; and providing incentives to care for our most vulnerable populations. Our analysis also demonstrates that our nation requires comprehensive reform to build the LTSS system we need through comprehensive workforce development, universal coverage through comprehensive financing reform, and the creation of an age-friendly public health system.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 has exposed the many deficits of the US LTSS system and made clear the interdependence of LTSS with public health. Policymakers have an opportunity to address these failings through a substantive reform of the LTSS system and increased collaboration with public health agencies and leaders. The opportunity for reform is now.

摘要

目的

为了解决因 COVID-19 而加剧的系统性问题,我们需要对美国长期服务和支持(LTSS)进行重构,使其与医疗保健系统和公共卫生系统相关联。我们提出了近期和长期的政策解决方案。近期的七项政策建议包括:要求所有 LTSS 场所统一公开报告 COVID-19 病例;确定并支持无偿护理人员;支持直接护理人员;加强公共卫生部门与 LTSS 机构和提供者之间的协调;加强卫生、LTSS 和公共卫生系统之间的协作和沟通;进一步减少 LTSS 中远程医疗的障碍;为弱势群体提供护理激励。长期改革应侧重于全面的劳动力发展、全面的 LTSS 融资改革以及创建一个适合老龄化的公共卫生系统。

背景

COVID-19 的沉重代价使美国长期服务和支持(LTSS)系统的缺陷成为焦点。尽管这些问题并不是新问题,但大流行加剧并放大了它们的影响,以至于这些问题不容忽视。COVID-19 感染和死亡的高发病率主要归咎于正规 LTSS 护理机构,特别是疗养院。然而,在这次大流行期间,还发现了其他系统性问题:未能在联邦一级协调美国公共卫生系统,以及长期投资不足和忽视州和地方一级公共卫生计划的影响。这些失败共同导致无法与 LTSS 系统协调,无法及早采取行动保护 LTSS 护理机构的居民和工作人员,这些机构是感染、传播和严重负面健康后果的热点。

方法

我们分析了 COVID-19 大流行对美国 LTSS 系统和政策安排的几个影响。对州预算的经济影响是多方面的,大流行对 Medicaid 产生了直接影响, Medicaid 是 LTSS 的主要资金来源,这反过来又进一步加剧了各州的财政问题。种族、族裔和社会经济地位之间的不平等以及无偿护理人员负担的加重都是显而易见的。同样需要更好地将 LTSS 与卫生、社会护理和公共卫生系统整合。

结果

我们提出了美国政策制定者可以采取的七项近期行动:在 LTSS 场所实施 COVID-19 病例的统一公开报告;确定并支持无偿护理人员;支持直接护理人员;加强公共卫生部门与 LTSS 机构和提供者之间的协调;加强卫生、LTSS 和公共卫生系统之间的协作和沟通;进一步减少 LTSS 中远程医疗的障碍;为我们最脆弱的人群提供护理激励。我们的分析还表明,我们的国家需要通过全面的劳动力发展、通过全面的融资改革实现全面覆盖以及创建一个适合老龄化的公共卫生系统来对 LTSS 系统进行全面改革。

结论

COVID-19 暴露了美国 LTSS 系统的许多缺陷,并清楚地表明 LTSS 与公共卫生之间的相互依存关系。政策制定者有机会通过实质性的 LTSS 系统改革和加强与公共卫生机构和领导者的合作来解决这些问题。改革的机会就在现在。

相似文献

1
2
Addressing Long-Term Services and Supports Reform via Medicare. Yes, Medicare, That Post-Acute Care Program.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Mar-Apr;32(2):108-124. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1563469. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
3
Emergency Flexibility for States to Increase and Maintain Medicaid Eligibility for LTSS under COVID-19.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):343-349. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1774312. Epub 2020 May 31.
4
Long-term care financing: lessons from France.
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):359-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12125.
5
Long-Term Services and Supports for Older Adults: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Aug;175(8):1172-1174. doi: 10.7326/M22-0864. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
An Assessment of State-Led Reform of Long-Term Services and Supports.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Jun;40(3):531-74. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2888460. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Financing long-term services and supports: challenges, goals, and needed reforms.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):209-226. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462680. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
The Role of Place in Person- and Family-Oriented Long-Term Services and Supports.
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1076-1138. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12664. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
9
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Consumer-Directed Personal Care in the New York Metropolitan Area: Trends in Use From 2017 to 2022.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 May;26(5):105535. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105535. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
5
Addressing infection prevention and control in Alabama through the long-term care strike team.
J Infect Prev. 2024 Sep;25(5):198-201. doi: 10.1177/17571774241239782. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Factors influencing long-term care facility performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):901. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11331-2.
7
A regional learning health system of congregate care facilities for COVID-19 response.
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Jan 24;8(3):e10407. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10407. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Nurses' Experiences of Care in Portuguese Nursing Homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus Group Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 11;20(16):6563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166563.
10
COVID-19 pandemic in long-term care: An international perspective for policy considerations.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Apr;10(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
What Federalism Means for the US Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019.
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 May 1;1(5):e200510. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0510.
2
Reimagining Nursing Homes in the Wake of COVID-19.
NAM Perspect. 2020 Sep 21;2020. doi: 10.31478/202009a. eCollection 2020.
3
Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act With Use of Long-term Care.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2018728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18728.
4
Severe Staffing And Personal Protective Equipment Shortages Faced By Nursing Homes During The COVID-19 Pandemic.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1812-1821. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01269. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
5
Moving Toward a Global Age-Friendly Ecosystem.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):1936-1940. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16675. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
6
Financial Vulnerability and Worker Well-Being: A Comparison of Long-Term Services and Supports Workers With Other Health Workers.
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):607-615. doi: 10.1177/1077558720930131. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
7
Characteristics of U.S. Nursing Homes with COVID-19 Cases.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1653-1656. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16661. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Long-Term Care Policy after Covid-19 - Solving the Nursing Home Crisis.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 3;383(10):903-905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2014811. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Disparities in the Population at Risk of Severe Illness From COVID-19 by Race/Ethnicity and Income.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):137-139. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Creating an Age-Friendly Public Health System.
Innov Aging. 2020 Jan 1;4(1):igz044. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz044. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验