Saloner Brendan, Lin LeeKai, Simon Kosali
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Room 344, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
Tunghai University, Department of Economics, No. 1727, Section 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung City, Taiwan.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Aug;115:108034. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108034. Epub 2020 May 12.
Efforts are underway to expand buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) in hospitals and affiliated health systems, yet we do not know whether physicians who prescribe buprenorphine are likely to be health-system affiliated. Our study draws upon SK&A data covering primary care physicians and psychiatrists in eight states (California, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Ohio, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and West Virginia), which were linked to a list of waivered buprenorphine prescribers from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency. We calculated waivered rates stratified by patient limits, physician type, health system affiliation, and area-level characteristics. We mapped the spatial relationship between hospitals and waivered physicians in four metro areas. We found that primary care physicians affiliated with hospital health systems were less likely to have waivers than unaffiliated physicians (3.6% versus 8.2%), but the reverse was true for psychiatrists (33.2% versus 26.2%). Waivered physicians affiliated with health systems were less likely to practice in high-poverty areas than unaffiliated counterparts, and affiliated physicians were also more likely to cluster near hospitals. Health systems may be able to improve access to buprenorphine treatment in their communities by creating either incentives or mandates for more affiliated physicians to obtain a waiver.
目前正在努力扩大医院及附属卫生系统中丁丙诺啡用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)的范围,但我们尚不清楚开具丁丙诺啡处方的医生是否可能隶属于卫生系统。我们的研究利用了SK&A数据,该数据涵盖八个州(加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、佐治亚州、马里兰州、俄亥俄州、罗德岛州、威斯康星州和西弗吉尼亚州)的初级保健医生和精神科医生,并与美国药物执法管理局的丁丙诺啡处方豁免医生名单相关联。我们计算了按患者限制、医生类型、卫生系统隶属关系和地区层面特征分层的豁免率。我们绘制了四个大都市地区医院与豁免医生之间的空间关系图。我们发现,隶属于医院卫生系统的初级保健医生获得豁免的可能性低于非隶属医生(3.6%对8.2%),但精神科医生的情况则相反(33.2%对26.2%)。隶属于卫生系统的豁免医生在高贫困地区执业的可能性低于非隶属同行,而且隶属医生也更有可能聚集在医院附近。卫生系统或许能够通过为更多隶属医生获得豁免创造激励措施或强制规定,来改善其所在社区获得丁丙诺啡治疗的机会。