CONNECT-AI Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea.
School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-to, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeong gi-do, South Korea.
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 22;38(34):5464-5473. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.038. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
With the advent of live-attenuated, quadrivalent, and cell-cultured vaccines for influenza, there have been discussions on the safety of these vaccines compared to conventional vaccines (such as inactivated, trivalent, and egg-cultured vaccines) because of the development of neurological adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to compare the trends and safety signals in the AE reporting systems of the US and South Korea and, more particularly, to evaluate the association between influenza vaccination and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
In total, 400,535 AE reports from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and 28,766 AE reports from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) between 2005 and 2017 were assessed. Disproportionality analysis was performed to detect the safety signals and examine the potential risk of GBS with influenza vaccination using the case/non-case approach.
In both databases, GBS was the most frequently reported AE following influenza immunization. Using the case/non-case approach, the adjusted reporting odds ratio (ROR) of GBS was 3.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.16-4.03) and 3.09 (95% CI, 0.83-11.45) in the VAERS and KAERS data, respectively. People vaccinated with live-attenuated vaccines reported 2.30 times (95% CI, 1.74-3.05) more cases of GBS than those vaccinated with other types of vaccines.
Our analysis of the VAERS and KAERS reports for AEs following immunization (AEFI) for influenza shows the need for cautious monitoring regarding the development of GBS after influenza vaccination, particularly, after live-attenuated vaccination. However, owing to potential reporting bias caused by limited AEFI reports after the introduction of new types of influenza vaccines, further prospective safety studies are needed.
随着针对流感的减毒活疫苗、四价疫苗和细胞培养疫苗的问世,人们对这些疫苗与传统疫苗(如灭活疫苗、三价疫苗和鸡胚培养疫苗)的安全性展开了讨论,原因是这些疫苗会引发神经不良事件(AE)。本研究旨在比较美国和韩国的不良事件报告系统中的趋势和安全信号,特别是评估流感疫苗接种与格林-巴利综合征(GBS)之间的关联。
共评估了 2005 年至 2017 年期间来自美国疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)的 400,535 份 AE 报告和来自韩国不良事件报告系统(KAERS)的 28,766 份 AE 报告。采用病例/非病例法进行不相称性分析,以检测流感疫苗接种的安全性信号,并评估 GBS 的潜在风险。
在两个数据库中,GBS 是流感免疫接种后最常报告的 AE。使用病例/非病例法,VAERS 和 KAERS 数据中 GBS 的调整报告比值比(ROR)分别为 3.57(95%置信区间 [CI],3.16-4.03)和 3.09(95% CI,0.83-11.45)。接种减毒活疫苗的人群报告的 GBS 病例比接种其他类型疫苗的人群多 2.30 倍(95% CI,1.74-3.05)。
我们对 VAERS 和 KAERS 流感疫苗接种后不良事件(AEFI)报告的分析表明,需要谨慎监测接种流感疫苗后 GBS 的发展情况,尤其是在接种减毒活疫苗后。然而,由于新型流感疫苗问世后,AEFI 报告有限,可能存在报告偏倚,因此需要进一步开展前瞻性安全性研究。