• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习评估标准化护理数据对家庭医疗保健病例组合分类的预测潜力。

Using machine learning to assess the predictive potential of standardized nursing data for home healthcare case-mix classification.

机构信息

Dutch Healthcare Authority (NZa), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Economics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1121-1129. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01213-9. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01213-9
PMID:32601992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561562/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Netherlands is currently investigating the feasibility of moving from fee-for-service to prospective payments for home healthcare, which would require a suitable case-mix system. In 2017, health insurers mandated a preliminary case-mix system as a first step towards generating information on client differences in relation to care use. Home healthcare providers have also increasingly adopted standardized nursing terminology (SNT) as part of their electronic health records (EHRs), providing novel data for predictive modelling.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the predictive potential of SNT data for improvement of the existing preliminary Dutch case-mix classification for home healthcare utilization.

METHODS

We extracted client-level data from the EHRs of a large home healthcare provider, including data from the existing Dutch case-mix system, SNT data (specifically, NANDA-I) and the hours of home healthcare provided. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of the case-mix system and the SNT data separately, and combined, using the machine learning algorithm Random Forest.

RESULTS

The case-mix system had a predictive performance of 22.4% cross-validated R-squared and 6.2% cross-validated Cumming's Prediction Measure (CPM). Adding SNT data led to a substantial relative improvement in predicting home healthcare hours, yielding 32.1% R-squared and 15.4% CPM.

DISCUSSION

The existing preliminary Dutch case-mix system distinguishes client needs to some degree, but not sufficiently. The results indicate that routinely collected SNT data contain sufficient additional predictive value to warrant further research for use in case-mix system design.

摘要

背景

荷兰目前正在研究将家庭医疗保健从按服务收费改为按预期付款的可行性,这将需要一个合适的病例组合系统。2017 年,健康保险公司强制实施了初步的病例组合系统,作为生成与护理使用相关的客户差异信息的第一步。家庭医疗保健提供者也越来越多地采用标准化护理术语(SNT)作为其电子健康记录(EHRs)的一部分,为预测模型提供了新颖的数据。

目的

探索 SNT 数据在改进现有荷兰家庭医疗保健利用初步病例组合分类方面的预测潜力。

方法

我们从一家大型家庭医疗保健提供商的 EHR 中提取了客户层面的数据,包括现有荷兰病例组合系统、SNT 数据(具体为 NANDA-I)和家庭医疗保健提供的小时数的数据。我们使用机器学习算法随机森林分别评估病例组合系统和 SNT 数据的预测准确性,并结合使用。

结果

病例组合系统的预测性能为 22.4%的交叉验证 R-squared 和 6.2%的交叉验证 Cumming's Prediction Measure(CPM)。添加 SNT 数据后,预测家庭医疗保健小时数的相对改善显著,产生 32.1%的 R-squared 和 15.4%的 CPM。

讨论

现有的初步荷兰病例组合系统在一定程度上区分了客户的需求,但还不够充分。结果表明,常规收集的 SNT 数据包含足够的额外预测价值,值得进一步研究,以用于病例组合系统设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de6/7561562/696e92d47956/10198_2020_1213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de6/7561562/770c34a486d0/10198_2020_1213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de6/7561562/696e92d47956/10198_2020_1213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de6/7561562/770c34a486d0/10198_2020_1213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de6/7561562/696e92d47956/10198_2020_1213_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using machine learning to assess the predictive potential of standardized nursing data for home healthcare case-mix classification.利用机器学习评估标准化护理数据对家庭医疗保健病例组合分类的预测潜力。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1121-1129. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01213-9. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Development of a casemix classification to predict costs of home care in the Netherlands: a study protocol.开发用于预测荷兰家庭护理成本的病例组合分类法:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e035683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035683.
3
Which client characteristics predict home-care needs? Results of a survey study among Dutch home-care nurses.哪些客户特征可预测家庭护理需求?一项针对荷兰家庭护理护士的调查研究结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):93-104. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12611. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Secondary use of standardized nursing care data for advancing nursing science and practice: a systematic review.标准化护理数据的二次利用在推进护理科学与实践中的作用:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1401-1411. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz086.
5
Predicting Future Service Use in Dutch Mental Healthcare: A Machine Learning Approach.预测荷兰精神保健服务的未来使用情况:一种机器学习方法。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jan;49(1):116-124. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01150-6. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Case mix of home health patients under capitated and fee-for-service payment.按人头付费和按服务收费方式下家庭健康患者的病例组合
Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1):79-113.
7
A systematic review of case-mix models for home health care payment: Making sense of variation.家庭医疗保健支付的病例组合模型系统评价:理解变化。
Health Policy. 2020 Feb;124(2):121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
8
Nursing home performance under case-mix reimbursement: responding to heavy-care incentives and market changes.按病例组合报销制度下的养老院绩效:应对重症护理激励措施和市场变化。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 1):815-34.
9
Providing appropriate services to individuals in the community: a preliminary case-mix for model allocating personal care services.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2008 Spring;30(4):378-401.
10
Identifying client characteristics to predict homecare use more accurately: a Delphi-study involving nurses and homecare purchasing specialists.识别客户特征以更准确地预测家庭护理使用情况:一项涉及护士和家庭护理采购专家的德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07733-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a casemix classification to predict costs of home care in the Netherlands: a study protocol.开发用于预测荷兰家庭护理成本的病例组合分类法:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e035683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035683.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2019 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update and CY 2020 Case-Mix Adjustment Methodology Refinements; Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Model; Home Health Quality Reporting Requirements; Home Infusion Therapy Requirements; and Training Requirements for Surveyors of National Accrediting Organizations. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;2019财年家庭健康预期支付系统费率更新及2020财年病例组合调整方法的完善;家庭健康基于价值的采购模式;家庭健康质量报告要求;家庭输液治疗要求;以及国家认证组织调查员的培训要求。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2018 Nov 13;83(219):56406-638.
2
The 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands: Getting the financial incentives right?荷兰 2015 年长期护理改革:财政激励措施得当吗?
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):312-316. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Value-based provider payment: towards a theoretically preferred design.基于价值的医疗服务提供者支付方式:迈向理论上更优的设计。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Jan;15(1):94-112. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000397. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Developing and utilising a new funding model for home-care services in New Zealand.为新西兰的居家护理服务开发并运用一种新的资金模式。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):345-355. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12525. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
5
A Practical Comparison Between the Predictive Power of Population-based Risk Stratification Models Using Data From Electronic Health Records Versus Administrative Claims: Setting a Baseline for Future EHR-derived Risk Stratification Models.使用电子健康记录数据与行政索赔数据的基于人群的风险分层模型预测能力的实际比较:为未来基于电子健康记录的风险分层模型设定基线
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):202-203. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000849.
6
Understanding the use of standardized nursing terminology and classification systems in published research: A case study using the International Classification for Nursing Practice(®).理解已发表研究中标准化护理术语和分类系统的使用:一项使用国际护理实践分类法(®)的案例研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
7
A Machine Learning Framework for Plan Payment Risk Adjustment.用于计划支付风险调整的机器学习框架。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2358-2374. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12464. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
8
The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands.荷兰2015年长期护理改革的政策与政治情况
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):241-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
9
Estimating community health needs against a Triple Aim background: What can we learn from current predictive risk models?在三重目标背景下评估社区健康需求:我们能从当前的预测风险模型中学到什么?
Health Policy. 2015 May;119(5):672-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review.现有美国护士协会认可的标准化护理术语的证据:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Aug;51(8):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 18.