Department of Hemato-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Immuno-hematology and Transfusion Medicine Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(4):501-508. doi: 10.1002/hon.2775. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
Among patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) receiving ABVD chemotherapy, PET performed after the first two treatment cycles (PET-2) has prognostic value. However, 15% of patients with a negative PET-2 will experience treatment failure. Here we prospectively evaluated serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels, to improve risk assessment in patients treated according to HD0607 PET-driven trial (#NCT00795613). In 266 patients with available serum samples, who have agreed to participate in a sub-study for assessment of the role of TARC monitoring, serum TARC levels were measured at baseline and at time of PET-2 by commercially available ELISA test kits. The primary end-point was to evaluate the association between TARC after 2 ABVD cycles and PFS. Median TARC-2 values were significantly higher in PET-2-positive patients compared to PET-2-negative patients (P = .001), and in patients with treatment failure compared to those in continuous CR (P = .01). The 4-year PFS significantly differed between patients with TARC-2 >800 pg/mL vs ≤800 pg/mL (64% vs 86%, P = .0001). Moreover, among PET-2-negative patients, elevated TARC-2 identified those with a worse prognosis (74% vs 89%; P = .01). In multivariable analysis, TARC-2 >800 pg/mL was a significant independent predictor of PFS in the whole study population (HR 2.39, P = .004) and among the PET-2-negative patients (HR 2.49, P = .02). In conclusion, our results indicate that TARC-2 serum levels above 800 pg/mL suggest the need for a stringent follow-up in PET-2-negative patients, and the evaluation of new drugs in PET-2-positive, who will likely fail to respond to intensification with escalated BEACOPP.
在接受 ABVD 化疗的晚期经典霍奇金淋巴瘤 (cHL) 患者中,在完成前两个治疗周期后进行的 PET(PET-2)检查具有预后价值。然而,15%的 PET-2 阴性患者会经历治疗失败。在这里,我们前瞻性地评估了血清胸腺和激活调节趋化因子(TARC)水平,以改善根据 HD0607 PET 驱动试验(#NCT00795613)接受治疗的患者的风险评估。在 266 名可提供血清样本且同意参加评估 TARC 监测作用的子研究的患者中,在基线和 PET-2 时通过商业上可用的 ELISA 试剂盒测量了血清 TARC 水平。主要终点是评估 2 个 ABVD 周期后 TARC 与 PFS 之间的关联。与 PET-2 阴性患者相比,PET-2 阳性患者的 TARC-2 值中位数明显更高(P =.001),与治疗失败患者相比,连续 CR 患者的 TARC-2 值中位数更高(P =.01)。与 TARC-2>800pg/ml 相比,TARC-2≤800pg/ml 的患者的 4 年 PFS 显著不同(64%vs86%,P=.0001)。此外,在 PET-2 阴性患者中,TARC-2 升高可识别出预后较差的患者(74%vs89%;P =.01)。在多变量分析中,TARC-2>800pg/ml 是整个研究人群(HR 2.39,P =.004)和 PET-2 阴性患者(HR 2.49,P =.02)中 PFS 的独立显著预测因素。总之,我们的结果表明,TARC-2 血清水平高于 800pg/ml 表明需要对 PET-2 阴性患者进行严格的随访,并评估 PET-2 阳性患者中可能无法对强化治疗伴递增 BEACOPP 产生反应的新药。