D'Ascenzi Flavio, Sanz-De La Garza María, Anselmi Francesca, Nunno Loredana, Arbelo Elena, Jordà Paloma, Marzotti Tommaso, Aprile Federica, Piu Pietro, Natali Benedetta Maria, Brugada Josep, Sitges Marta, Mondillo Sergio
Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Centre for Biomedical Research on CardioVascular Diseases (CIBERCV), Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;320:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
The electrocardiographic (ECG) definition of Brugada syndrome (BS) can be challenging because benign ECG abnormalities, such as right bundle branch block (RBBB), may mimic pathological ECG characteristics of BrS. However, although myocardial delay and deformation can be quantified by advanced imaging, it has not yet been used to differentiate between BrS and RBBB. The aim of this study was to characterize the electro-mechanical behavior of the heart of patients with type-1 BrS and isolated complete RBBB in order to differentiate these conditions.
In this two-center study, 66 subjects were analyzed by standard and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE): 22 type-1 BrS, 24 isolated complete RBBB, and 20 healthy subjects. The participants were not treated by any drug potentially influencing myocardial conduction.
Standard echocardiographic parameters did not differ among the groups. The greatest right ventricular (RV) mechanical dispersion was found in RBBB. Mean absolute deviations (MADs) of time-to-peak longitudinal strain calculated for each left ventricular (LV) region were greater in patients with RBBB as compared to BrS (p < .01). No differences were found between BrS and controls (p = .36). MADs in the basal segments in RBBB group were greater than MADs found in BrS group and controls (37.3 ms vs. 26.7 ms and 29.0 ms, respectively, p < .05). The greatest differences were found in the antero-septal, anterior, lateral, and infero-septal basal segments.
Advanced echocardiographic techniques may help to differentiate between BrS and RBBB. Indeed, STE allows to identify an electro-mechanical conduction delay in RBBB patients that is not found in patients affected by type-1 BrS.
Brugada综合征(BS)的心电图(ECG)定义可能具有挑战性,因为良性ECG异常,如右束支传导阻滞(RBBB),可能会模仿BrS的病理性ECG特征。然而,尽管心肌延迟和变形可以通过先进的成像技术进行量化,但尚未用于区分BrS和RBBB。本研究的目的是表征1型BrS和孤立性完全性RBBB患者心脏的电机械行为,以区分这些情况。
在这项双中心研究中,通过标准和斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)对66名受试者进行了分析:22例1型BrS,24例孤立性完全性RBBB,以及20名健康受试者。参与者未接受任何可能影响心肌传导的药物治疗。
标准超声心动图参数在各组之间没有差异。RBBB组的右心室(RV)机械离散度最大。与BrS患者相比,RBBB患者每个左心室(LV)区域计算的峰值纵向应变时间的平均绝对偏差(MADs)更大(p <.01)。BrS组与对照组之间未发现差异(p =.36)。RBBB组基底节段的MADs大于BrS组和对照组(分别为37.3 ms vs. 26.7 ms和29.0 ms),p <.05)。最大差异出现在前间隔、前壁、侧壁和下间隔基底节段。
先进的超声心动图技术可能有助于区分BrS和RBBB。事实上,STE可以识别RBBB患者中存在的电机械传导延迟,而在1型BrS患者中未发现这种延迟。