• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿胀吸脂术后长期疗效和患者满意度评估。

Evaluation of Long-Term Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Results After Tumescent Liposuction.

机构信息

All authors are affiliated with the Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, San Diego, California.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46 Suppl 1:S31-S37. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002498.

DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002498
PMID:32604228
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liposuction is one of the most common cosmetic surgery procedures around the world. Tumescent liposuction using local anesthesia has been shown to be the safest technique. Few long-term studies of results and satisfaction have been published on tumescent liposuction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term results and patient satisfaction of tumescent liposuction in a single-center institution.

METHODS

Patients (n = 600) who had tumescent liposuction performed in our practice from 2002 to 2014 were contacted through letter, email, or phone to complete a questionnaire survey and in-office follow-up visit regarding their past liposuction procedures.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (n = 32) completed the patient questionnaire survey and followed up in the office. Surgeon and blinded evaluators saw significant differences in both the neck volume (surgeon evaluator: 2.42 vs. 0.71, p < .01; blinded evaluator: 2.8-1, p = .02) and Investigator Assessment Skin Laxity scales (blinded evaluator: 1.14 vs. 0.77, p < .01 for laxity and 1.33 vs. 0.75, p < .01 for firmness; surgeon evaluator: 1.17 vs. 0.83, p = .01 for laxity and 1.31 vs. 0.83; p < .01 for firmness). The mean follow-up period was 8.9 years overall and 9.9 years for the neck. Overall, 85.7% of the patients would recommend liposuction to their friends and family members.

CONCLUSION

Tumescent liposuction is a safe procedure with long-lasting results and high patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

吸脂术是全球最常见的美容手术之一。局部麻醉肿胀吸脂术已被证明是最安全的技术。关于肿胀吸脂术的长期效果和满意度的研究很少。

目的

评估单中心机构肿胀吸脂术的长期效果和患者满意度。

方法

通过信函、电子邮件或电话联系 2002 年至 2014 年在我们诊所接受肿胀吸脂术的患者(n=600),以完成关于他们过去吸脂术的问卷调查和门诊随访。

结果

32 名患者(n=32)完成了患者问卷调查并在诊所进行了随访。外科医生和盲法评估员在颈部体积(外科医生评估员:2.42 比 0.71,p<0.01;盲法评估员:2.8-1,p=0.02)和研究者评估皮肤松弛度量表(盲法评估员:1.14 比 0.77,p<0.01 为松弛度,1.33 比 0.75,p<0.01 为紧致度;外科医生评估员:1.17 比 0.83,p=0.01 为松弛度,1.31 比 0.83,p<0.01 为紧致度)方面均有显著差异。总体平均随访时间为 8.9 年,颈部为 9.9 年。总的来说,85.7%的患者会向朋友和家人推荐吸脂术。

结论

肿胀吸脂术是一种安全的手术,具有持久的效果和高患者满意度。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Long-Term Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Results After Tumescent Liposuction.肿胀吸脂术后长期疗效和患者满意度评估。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46 Suppl 1:S31-S37. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002498.
2
Prevention of Progression of Lipedema With Liposuction Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia: Results of an International Consensus Conference.《肿胀局麻吸脂术预防脂肪水肿进展:国际共识会议结果》。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Feb;46(2):220-228. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002019.
3
Safe extensive tumescent liposuction with segmental infiltration of lower concentration lidocaine under monitored anesthesia care.在麻醉监护下采用低浓度利多卡因分段浸润进行安全的大面积肿胀吸脂术。
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;74(1):6-11. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182933de7.
4
Safety of tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia in a series of 4,380 patients.4380 例患者行局部麻醉肿胀吸脂术的安全性。
Dermatology. 2011;222(3):278-81. doi: 10.1159/000327375. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction.利多卡因剂量为55毫克/千克的肿胀麻醉用于吸脂手术是安全的。
Dermatol Surg. 1996 Nov;22(11):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00634.x.
6
High Volume Liposuction in Tumescence Anesthesia in Lipedema Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.《肿胀麻醉下大容量吸脂术治疗脂肪水肿患者:回顾性分析》
J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Mar 1;20(3):326-334. doi: 10.36849/JDD.5828.
7
Estimated Maximal Safe Dosages of Tumescent Lidocaine.肿胀液利多卡因的估计最大安全剂量
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1350-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001119.
8
On Beyond Lidocaine: Reconsidering Local Anesthetics in Tumescent Liposuction-A Critical Review.超越利多卡因:重新审视肿胀吸脂术中的局部麻醉药——一篇批判性综述
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;77 Suppl 1:S66-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000709.
9
Tumescent liposuction report performance measurement initiative: national survey results.肿胀吸脂报告绩效评估倡议:全国调查结果
Dermatol Surg. 2004 Jul;30(7):967-77; discussion 978. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30300.x.
10
Liposuction in cosmetic dermatology.美容皮肤科中的抽脂术。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001 Jan;26(1):3-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00748.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Liposuction Port-Site Protection: Necessity or Needless Expense?抽脂术切口部位的保护:是必要之举还是不必要的花费?
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Nov 26;6:ojae098. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae098. eCollection 2024.
2
Combining Liposuction and Thread-Lifting for Middle-Lower Facial Rejuvenation.吸脂术联合线雕提升中下面部年轻化
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(9):1672-1678. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03872-y. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Donor Site Satisfaction Following Autologous Fat Transfer for Total Breast Reconstruction.自体脂肪移植用于全乳房重建后的供区满意度。
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Jan 9;43(1):40-48. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac125.