Suppr超能文献

中国上海某大学癌症中心成年癌症患者化疗前护理评估:最佳实践实施项目

Prechemotherapy nursing assessment among adult cancer patients in a university cancer center in Shanghai, China: a best practice implementation project.

作者信息

Wang Liying, McArthur Alexa, Lu Zhenqi, Yang Yang, Lu Haiyan, Chen Fengzhen, Xue Mei

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University.

Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing: a JBI Center of Excellence, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

JBI Evid Implement. 2020 Sep;18(3):308-317. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000233.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current implementation project aimed to promote evidence-based practice with prechemotherapy nursing assessment among adult cancer patients in a large university cancer center in Shanghai, China, over a 6-month timeframe.

INTRODUCTION

Prechemotherapy nursing assessment is an essential element of cancer patient care, aiming to prevent or minimize potential problems from chemotherapy treatment. Regular comprehensive prechemotherapy assessment is not part of routine care currently in many clinical settings within China.

METHODS

The project utilized the JBI approach to implementation, incorporating audit and feedback tools. Twelve evidence-based audit criteria were developed for use in the program. A baseline audit was conducted of prechemotherapy nursing assessment among adult cancer patients, with a sample size of 68 patients and 36 nursing staff. Following implementation of systematic strategies based on the analysis of three main barriers, a follow-up audit involving a similar sample as the first audit was conducted using the same audit criteria.

RESULTS

The baseline audit indicated that for nursing assessment among adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, the criteria (1, 10, 11 and 12) which related to nurse education, weight measurement, premedication and access device assessment had very high compliance (from 93 to 100%). Compliance for criteria (2, 6, 7, 9) related to medical history, previous exposure to chemotherapy, patients' or caregivers' comprehension of treatment and psychosocial assessment was 0%, while compliance with the other five criteria (3, 4, 5, 8) was low, ranging from 16 to 61%. There was improvement in all 12 criteria in the follow-up audit. Criteria 1, 11 and 12 maintained high compliance (100%). Criterion 2 (patients' medical history), criterion 3 (presence or absence of allergies), criterion 7 (previous exposure to chemotherapy) and criterion 9 (psychosocial elements) demonstrated a significant improvement in compliance. Although progress has been made, there were still some criteria that require further improvement. These included assessment of patients' current diagnosis and cancer status (criterion 4, from 61 to 66%), recent laboratory results (criterion 5, from 31 to 62%), patients' and/or caregivers' comprehension of information regarding the disease and treatment (criterion 6, from 0 to 34%), any previous exposure to chemotherapy agents (criterion 7, from 0 to 57%), and physical assessment of the patient (criterion 8, from 46 to 72%).

CONCLUSION

The project achieved increased compliance with evidence-based best practice in all assessed audit criteria improving the practice of prechemotherapy assessment. Involvement of informatics technology is a great strategy to help overcome barriers, simplify the change process and assist in sustaining evidence-based practice change. Future plans and ideas are in place and have been discussed. Further audits will need to be carried out to improve the validity and quality of nursing assessment.

摘要

目的

当前的实施项目旨在在中国上海一家大型大学癌症中心,在6个月的时间内促进成年癌症患者化疗前护理评估的循证实践。

引言

化疗前护理评估是癌症患者护理的重要组成部分,旨在预防或最小化化疗治疗的潜在问题。目前在中国的许多临床环境中,定期全面的化疗前评估并非常规护理的一部分。

方法

该项目采用循证卫生保健国际合作中心(JBI)的实施方法,纳入审核与反馈工具。为该项目制定了12条循证审核标准。对成年癌症患者的化疗前护理评估进行了基线审核,样本量为68名患者和36名护理人员。在分析三个主要障碍的基础上实施系统策略后,使用相同的审核标准对与首次审核样本类似的样本进行了后续审核。

结果

基线审核表明,对于接受化疗的成年癌症患者的护理评估,与护士教育、体重测量、预处理和通路装置评估相关的标准(1、10、11和12)具有很高的依从性(从93%到100%)。与病史、既往化疗暴露史、患者或护理人员对治疗的理解以及社会心理评估相关的标准(2、6、7、9)的依从性为0%,而其他五条标准(3、4、5、8)的依从性较低,在16%至61%之间。后续审核中所有12条标准均有改善。标准1、11和12保持高依从性(100%)。标准2(患者病史)、标准3(有无过敏)、标准7(既往化疗暴露史)和标准9(社会心理因素)的依从性有显著提高。尽管取得了进展,但仍有一些标准需要进一步改进。这些包括患者当前诊断和癌症状态的评估(标准4,从61%到66%)、近期实验室检查结果(标准5,从31%到62%)、患者和/或护理人员对疾病和治疗信息的理解(标准6,从0到34%)、既往任何化疗药物暴露史(标准7,从0到57%)以及患者的体格检查(标准8,从46%到72%)。

结论

该项目在所有评估的审核标准中提高了循证最佳实践的依从性,改善了化疗前评估的实践。信息技术的参与是帮助克服障碍、简化变革过程并有助于维持循证实践变革的一项重要策略。未来的计划和想法已经制定并进行了讨论。需要进一步开展审核以提高护理评估的有效性和质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验