Time-Driven activity-based costing identifies opportunities for process efficiency and cost optimization for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) is a commonly performed procedure in children, but its actual cost implications on the healthcare ecosystem have not been adequately defined. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is a novel cost accounting method derived from value based healthcare systems that may offer one pathway to assess institutional costs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the true cost of a robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in the pediatric population using TDABC, and compare it to traditional cost accounting. And to utilize TDABC to minimize cost and improve time-flow efficiency.

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS: The RALP care pathway was defined from patient arrival to the pre-operative suite to discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Process maps were created with an interdisciplinary team to survey RALP activities. Retrospective time stamps were obtained from the electronic medical record for fiscal year 2016 (FY16) RALP cases, and were validated by prospectively stopwatch timing additional RALP cases. Male and female pediatric patients undergoing a unilateral RALP during FY16 and during the prospective study period (June 2017-October 2017) were included. Procedure costs were calculated using TDABC after determining the capacity cost rate for all personnel and assets, and multiplying them with the time stamps.

RESULTS

25 RALP cases were analyzed for FY16. TDABC determined a total cost of $15 319/case, when direct, indirect and capital robot cost are included. Traditional cost accounting amounted to a total of $16 158/case. The current robot utilization rate is 22% of total capacity, effectively increasing the total RALP cost by 16%. Time stamps with the most variance were pre-operative services (115 ± 27.5 min), robotic console (142 min ±30.7 min) and PACU times (145 ± 101.1 min) (Figure) DISCUSSION: This study represents the first TDABC implementation in robot-assisted pediatric procedures. Previous TDABC in other areas of urology similarly revealed discrepancies between traditional cost accounting and TDABC. The present study demonstrates a higher total cost than previous cost accounting studies for the RALP, however, this is the first effort to include indirect costs in the final calculations. This study does convey the limitations of a retrospective analysis and those inherent to a single institution study.

CONCLUSION

TDABC defined the magnitude of cost variation based on robot utilization of a RALP. Traditional cost accounting overestimates the actual costs of a RALP. TDABC also identified high-cost and high variability loci in the RALP process map that will be targeted for process and quality improvement while further reducing assessed costs.