Suppr超能文献

新型无袖带血压监测仪的动态血压监测:一项初步研究。

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring by a novel cuffless device: a pilot study.

机构信息

European Society of Hypertension, Excellence Center, Istituto Clinico Verano Brianza, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy.

Interventional Cardiology Department, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2020 Dec;29(6):375-381. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2020.1785273. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cuffless blood pressure (CL-BP) measurements are believed to be a potentially alternative to cuff-occlusion-based (C-BP) measurement. A new cuffless device was developed for ambulatory BP monitoring. We assessed the accuracy of a new CL-BP device compared to a standard oscillatory C-BP device over the 24 h.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four consecutive patients were included in the study. BP was measured simultaneously by the CL-BP device and by a C-BP device over the 24 h. Calculations included 24 h mean systolic (S) BP, the mean diastolic (D) BP and the heart rate (HR). Correlations between the CL-BP and C-BP measurements were sought using Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Using the C-BP device, the 24 h SBP value for the cohort was 125.4 ± 10.9 mmHg (mean ± SD); the corresponding DBP value being 75 ± 8.3 mmHg. Mean SBP/DBP were higher with the CL-BP device, i.e. 131.1 ± 15.9/80.2 ± 9.7 mmHg . The correlation coefficients between the two sets of values were significant (SBP:  = 0.58, DBP:  = 0.65). Better correlations for SBP and DBP were found 1) in patients with BMI > 25 (SBP:  = 0.65, DBP:  = 0.70) compared to those with BMI <25 and 2) in males compared to females (SBP:  = 0.71, DBP:  = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

In our patients a CL-BP device estimated 24 h mean SBP and DBP differently from the classical oscillometric device, with a moderate correlation. CL-BP measurements were most accurate on male and overweight subjects.

摘要

目的

无袖带血压(CL-BP)测量被认为是替代袖带加压法(C-BP)测量的一种潜在方法。一种新的无袖带设备被开发用于动态血压监测。我们评估了一种新的 CL-BP 设备与标准振荡式 C-BP 设备在 24 小时内的准确性。

材料和方法

84 名连续患者纳入研究。BP 通过 CL-BP 设备和 C-BP 设备同时测量 24 小时。计算包括 24 小时平均收缩压(S)BP、平均舒张压(D)BP 和心率(HR)。使用 Pearson 相关系数和 Bland-Altman 图寻找 CL-BP 和 C-BP 测量之间的相关性。

结果

使用 C-BP 设备,队列的 24 小时 SBP 值为 125.4±10.9mmHg(平均值±标准差);相应的 DBP 值为 75±8.3mmHg。CL-BP 设备的平均 SBP/DBP 值更高,即 131.1±15.9/80.2±9.7mmHg。两组值之间的相关系数具有显著意义(SBP:=0.58,DBP:=0.65)。在 BMI>25 的患者中,SBP 和 DBP 的相关性更好(SBP:=0.65,DBP:=0.70),而在 BMI<25 的患者中,SBP 和 DBP 的相关性更好(SBP:=0.65,DBP:=0.70),而在 BMI<25 的患者中,SBP 和 DBP 的相关性更好(SBP:=0.65,DBP:=0.70),而在 BMI<25 的患者中,SBP 和 DBP 的相关性更好(SBP:=0.65,DBP:=0.70);与女性相比,男性的相关性更好(SBP:=0.71,DBP:=0.77)。

结论

在我们的患者中,CL-BP 设备与经典的振荡式设备相比,估计 24 小时平均 SBP 和 DBP 不同,相关性中等。CL-BP 测量在男性和超重患者中最准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验