[Tolerance Mechanism and Cadmium Enrichment Abilities in Two L. Cultivars].

A hydroponic experiment was conducted to explore the differences in growth status and Cd accumulation characteristics of two L. cultivars (QY-1 and SYH) under different concentrations of cadmium (Cd) stress (0, 2, and 5 mg·L). The Cd subcellular compartmentalization and antioxidant enzyme activities were determined to elucidate the intrinsic mechanism of the differences in the Cd accumulation capacity between the two cultivars of L. Furthermore, field trials were conducted to further verify the differences in phytoremediation of the two cultivars. Results show that neither of the cultivars exhibited obvious growth inhibition under Cd stress. Under the 2 mg·L Cd condition, there were no significant differences in shoot Cd concentrations between the two cultivars. Under 5 mg·L Cd condition, however, the Cd concentrations in both shoot and root of SYH were significantly higher than that of QY-1, which increased by 32.05% and 99.57%, respectively. In addition, the bioconcentration factor (BCF) of the root in SYH is significantly higher than that of QY-1. The subcellular Cd distribution in leaves of the two cultivars of L. showed that, with an increase of Cd stress, Cd concentrations of heat stable protein (HSP) and metal-rich granule (MRG) fractions in leaves significantly increased by 143.69% and 118.91% for QY-1, and by 63.34% and 118.91% for SYH. Thus, the segregation of Cd in HSP and MRG, which was reported to be biological detoxified metal fractions (BDM), might play an important role in the detoxification of L. at a subcellular level under Cd stress. Moreover, the distribution of Cd in the cellular debris fraction might be another important factor contributing to the differences in Cd accumulation of the two L. cultivars, which was 4.41 times higher in SYH than in QY-1 under Cd stress. The results of the antioxidant enzyme activities of two L. cultivars showed that, under the 5 mg·L Cd condition, the antioxidant enzyme system may represent an important detoxification mechanism for QY-1 to cope with stress induced by high concentrations of Cd, while SYH is more effective in reducing the toxicity of Cd by separation of Cd into BDM fractions. The results of the field trial confirmed that the Cd concentrations in the above- and underground parts of SYH were 2.34 and 1.43 times higher than in QY-1, respectively. Therefore, SYH possess a higher Cd phytoextraction capacity than QY-1, and might be a good candidate for the remediation of moderate and mildly Cd-contaminated farmland.