Zhang Wei, Li Xinyi, Li Xiaojing
36639 Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
J Cutan Med Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec;24(6):608-618. doi: 10.1177/1203475420937963. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
BACKGROUND: Scars with poor cosmesis that develop after wound healing may affect normal life. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative hypertrophic scars or keloids. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to February 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of BTXA in preventing hypertrophic scars or keloids. The primary outcome measures included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, scar width, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs involving 497 cases (372 patients) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant differences in the VAS score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.55, < .00001), VSS score (WMD = -1.02, 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.32, = .004), scar width (WMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.29 to -0.08, = .0008), and patient satisfaction (relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, = .01). Four studies reported trivial adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that BTXA was more effective than the control treatment in preventing postoperative scars and improving the cosmetic appearance of facial scars for East Asians, and no serious adverse events were found during the follow-up period. However, there was insufficient evidence to support the use of BTXA for the prevention of scars in patients from other ethnic groups and regions or scars in non-facial areas.
背景:伤口愈合后形成的美容效果不佳的瘢痕可能会影响正常生活。 目的:评估A型肉毒毒素(BTXA)预防术后增生性瘢痕或瘢痕疙瘩的有效性和安全性。 方法:通过检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE数据库,从其创建日期至2020年2月,进行一项系统评价,以寻找评估BTXA预防增生性瘢痕或瘢痕疙瘩有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局指标包括温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、瘢痕宽度、患者满意度和不良事件。 结果:纳入12项RCT,涉及497例(372例患者)。荟萃分析显示,VAS评分(加权平均差[WMD]=1.31,95%CI=1.06至1.55,P<.00001)、VSS评分(WMD=-1.02,95%CI=-1.72至-0.32,P=.004)、瘢痕宽度(WMD=-0.18,95%CI=-0.29至-0.08,P=.0008)和患者满意度(相对危险度=1.25,95%CI=1.06-1.49,P=.01)存在显著差异。四项研究报告了轻微不良事件。 结论:这项荟萃分析表明,对于东亚人,BTXA在预防术后瘢痕和改善面部瘢痕的美容外观方面比对照治疗更有效,且随访期间未发现严重不良事件。然而,没有足够的证据支持在其他种族和地区的患者中使用BTXA预防瘢痕或用于非面部区域的瘢痕。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019-3-21
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018-12-12