• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A型肉毒杆菌毒素预防术后瘢痕及促进伤口愈合的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fu Ziyao, Huang Hanzi, Huang Jiuzuo

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jan;21(1):176-190. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14617. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1111/jocd.14617
PMID:34859567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) has shown underlying effects for wound healing improvement. New small clinical trials keep emerging every year and updated evidence-based information is warranted. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BTXA for preventing scarring.

METHODS

Four databases were searched to recruit randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which compared the surgical wounds treated with BTXA vs. those treated with placebo or blank control. The outcomes were primarily quantified by measures including the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scales (SBSES), modified SBSES (mSBSES), and scar width. Patients' satisfaction and adverse events were also reported.

RESULTS

In total, 16 RCTs involving 671 cases (510 patients) were included. The outcome showed significant superiority of BTXA in VSS (mean difference [MD] = -1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.00 to -0.65, p = 0.0001), VAS (MD = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.52, p < 0.00001), SBSES or mSBSES (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.10, p < 0.0001), scar width (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.10, p < 0.0001), and patients' satisfaction (risk ratio [RR] = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49, p = 0.01). No significant difference of adverse events incidence was observed (RR = 1.46 95% CI: 0.64-3.33, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin type A is effective and safe for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement, especially for facial wounds of Asians. Further studies should manage to standardize the treatment algorithm, while mSBSES is recommended for scar assessment.

摘要

背景

A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BTXA)已显示出对改善伤口愈合的潜在作用。每年都有新的小型临床试验不断涌现,因此需要更新基于证据的信息。本研究旨在评估BTXA预防瘢痕形成的有效性和安全性。

方法

检索四个数据库,以招募随机临床试验(RCT),这些试验比较了接受BTXA治疗的手术伤口与接受安慰剂或空白对照治疗的手术伤口。主要通过包括温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、石溪瘢痕评估量表(SBSES)、改良SBSES(mSBSES)和瘢痕宽度在内的测量指标进行量化。还报告了患者的满意度和不良事件。

结果

总共纳入了16项RCT,涉及671例患者(510名患者)。结果显示,BTXA在VSS(平均差[MD]= -1.32,95%置信区间[CI]:-2.00至-0.65,p = 0.0001)、VAS(MD = 1.29,95%CI:1.05 - 1.52,p < 0.00001)、SBSES或mSBSES(MD = -0.18,95%CI:-0.27至-0.10,p < 0.0001)、瘢痕宽度(MD = -0.18,95%CI:-0.27至-0.10,p < 0.0001)以及患者满意度(风险比[RR]= 1.25,95%CI:1.06 - 1.49,p = 0.01)方面具有显著优势。未观察到不良事件发生率的显著差异(RR = 1.46,95%CI:0.64 - 3.33,p = 0.36)。

结论

A型肉毒杆菌毒素对预防术后瘢痕形成和改善伤口愈合有效且安全,尤其对于亚洲人的面部伤口。进一步的研究应设法规范治疗方案,同时建议使用mSBSES进行瘢痕评估。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.A型肉毒杆菌毒素预防术后瘢痕及促进伤口愈合的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jan;21(1):176-190. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14617. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Scar Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.A型肉毒毒素注射预防瘢痕的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;43(5):1241-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01358-w. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving the Cosmetic Appearance of Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.A型肉毒杆菌毒素预防术后瘢痕及改善瘢痕外观的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Cutan Med Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec;24(6):608-618. doi: 10.1177/1203475420937963. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
4
The Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injection for postoperative scar prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.A型肉毒毒素注射预防术后瘢痕的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Apr;19(4):799-808. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13139. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Injections in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving Scar Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肉毒毒素注射预防术后瘢痕和改善瘢痕质量的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;45(5):2350-2362. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02196-5. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Improving Scar Quality and Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.A型肉毒毒素改善瘢痕质量和伤口愈合的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Apr 14;40(5):NP273-NP285. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz165.
7
A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis: Botulinum Toxin A Effect on Postoperative Facial Scar Prevention.一项系统评价与Meta分析:A型肉毒杆菌毒素对术后面部瘢痕预防的作用
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb;46(1):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02596-7. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
The effect of botulinum toxin injection dose on the appearance of surgical scar.肉毒毒素注射剂量对手术瘢痕外观的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 1;11(1):13670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93203-x.
9
The safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin for management of scars: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.肉毒毒素治疗瘢痕的安全性和有效性:系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Toxicon. 2019 Aug;166:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
Appropriate Timing of Early Postoperative Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Thyroidectomy Scar Management: A Split-Scar Study.甲状腺切除术瘢痕管理中肉毒毒素 A 早期术后注射的适宜时机:一项分割瘢痕研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):659e-668e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006064.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of phototherapies for upper lip scars in cleft lip patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.唇裂患者上唇瘢痕光疗法的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1407-1414. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002055.
2
Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes.单孔加一孔法在小儿机器人辅助下 Lich-Gregoir 输尿管再植术治疗膀胱输尿管反流中的应用:与短期结果的对比分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01467-y.