Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Programa Integrado em Saúde Ambiental e do Trabalhador (PISAT). Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Jun 26;54:64. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001736. eCollection 2020.
To estimate maternal mortality ratio according to occupation in Brazil.
This is a mortality study conducted with national data from the Mortality Information System (SIM) and the Live Birth Information System (SINASC) in 2015. Maternal mortality ratios were estimated according to the occupation recorded in death certificates, using the Brazilian Classification of Occupation (CBO), version 2002.
A total of 1,738 maternal deaths records were found, corresponding to a maternal mortality ratio of 57.6/100,000 live births. It varied among occupational groups, with higher estimates among service and agricultural workers, particularly for domestic workers (123.2/100,000 live births), followed by general agricultural workers (88.3/100,000 live births). Manicurists and nursing technicians also presented high maternal mortality ratio. Maternal occupation was not reported in 17.0% of SIM registers and in 13.2% of SINASC data. Inconsistent records of occupation were found."Housewife" prevailed in SIM (35.5%) and SINASC (39.1%).
Maternal mortality ratio differs by occupation, suggesting a work contribution, which requires further research focusing occupational risk factors. Socioeconomic factors are closely related to occupation, and their combination with work exposures and the poor access to health services need to be also addressed.
根据职业估计巴西的孕产妇死亡率。
这是一项使用 2015 年全国死因监测系统(SIM)和活产登记系统(SINASC)数据开展的死亡率研究。根据死亡证明中记录的职业,使用 2002 年版巴西职业分类(CBO)估计孕产妇死亡率。
共发现 1738 例孕产妇死亡记录,孕产妇死亡率为 57.6/10 万活产。职业群体之间存在差异,服务和农业工人的估计值较高,尤其是家政工人(123.2/10 万活产)和一般农业工人(88.3/10 万活产)。美甲师和护理技师的孕产妇死亡率也较高。17.0%的 SIM 登记和 13.2%的 SINASC 数据未报告孕产妇职业。职业记录不一致。在 SIM(35.5%)和 SINASC(39.1%)中,“家庭主妇”占主导地位。
孕产妇死亡率因职业而异,提示职业有一定贡献,这需要进一步研究职业风险因素。社会经济因素与职业密切相关,需要结合工作暴露和卫生服务获取不足等因素进行研究。