Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 1;10(3):162-164. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.31.
Policy decisions about healthcare coverage in Canada and the United States in the 1960s placed two virtually identical systems on different evolutionary paths in the physician and hospital sectors. However, prescription drug coverage remained outside Canada's single-payer model, and employer-based coverage continued to be the norm for the workforce population, as is the case across the broad healthcare system in the United States. As a result the current debate about pharmacare in Canada mirrors in political microcosm the larger debate on universal health insurance among American Democrats. In each case the near-term prospects for a single-payer plan appear slim.
20 世纪 60 年代,加拿大和美国在医疗保健覆盖政策方面做出了决策,这使得医生和医院这两个几乎完全相同的体系走上了不同的发展道路。然而,处方药覆盖仍然不在加拿大单一支付者模式之内,而基于雇主的覆盖仍然是劳动力人口的规范,就像美国整个医疗保健系统的情况一样。因此,加拿大目前关于药品福利的辩论在政治微观层面上反映了美国民主党内关于全民健康保险的更大辩论。在这两种情况下,单一支付者计划的近期前景似乎都很渺茫。