School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 1;10(8):495-499. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.100.
The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union provides for an extension of Canadian patents for prescription drugs by up to 2 years. One of the arguments advanced for longer patent time is to compensate companies for the length of the overall drug development time (the time between patent application and market approval). This study investigates overall development time in Canada for different groups of drugs approved between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 and how many of these drugs are eligible for up to 2 years of patent term extension. Based on a list of patents and dates of market approval, the change in overall development time for all drugs was calculated along with whether there were differences in development time between different groups of drugs. Using Canadian patent filing dates, overall development time for all drugs went from a mean of 2240 days (95% CI: 1832, 2648) in 2009 to 4197 days (95% CI: 3728, 4665) in 2018 (analysis of variance [ANOVA], <.0001). Using first global patent filing dates, overall development time went from a mean of 4481 days (95% CI: 3053, 5908) in 2009 to 6298 days (95% CI: 4839, 7756) in 2018 (ANOVA, =.0118). There was a statistically significant difference in the overall development mean time between small molecule drugs (3553, 95% CI: 3361, 3746) and biologics (3903, 95% CI: 3595, 4212), (t test, =.0487) when using Canadian patent filing dates but not when first global patent filing dates were used. There was no statistically significant change in overall development time among drugs that were substantial, moderate or little to none additional therapeutic value compared to existing drugs. Out of 238 drugs, 218 (91.6%) would have been eligible for patent term extension with 195 (80.7%) eligible for the full 2 years. Patent term extension does not appear to be justified based on changes in overall development time, except possibly in the case of biologics. There are also trade offs in terms of increased expenditures that need to be considered if patent terms are lengthened.
《加拿大与欧盟全面经济贸易协定》规定,将加拿大处方药专利延长至多 2 年。延长专利期限的一个论据是,要为公司在整个药物开发时间(从专利申请到市场批准的时间)内的投入补偿。本研究调查了 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间批准的不同药物组别的总体开发时间,以及这些药物中有多少有资格获得长达 2 年的专利期限延长。根据专利清单和市场批准日期,计算了所有药物的整体开发时间变化,以及不同药物组之间的开发时间是否存在差异。使用加拿大专利申请日期,所有药物的总体开发时间从 2009 年的平均 2240 天(95%CI:1832,2648)增加到 2018 年的 4197 天(95%CI:3728,4665)(方差分析[ANOVA],<.0001)。使用首次全球专利申请日期,总体开发时间从 2009 年的平均 4481 天(95%CI:3053,5908)增加到 2018 年的 6298 天(95%CI:4839,7756)(ANOVA,=.0118)。使用加拿大专利申请日期时,小分子药物(3553,95%CI:3361,3746)和生物制剂(3903,95%CI:3595,4212)之间的总体开发时间平均值存在统计学显著差异(t 检验,=.0487),但使用首次全球专利申请日期时则不存在。与现有药物相比,具有较大、中等或较小额外治疗价值的药物的总体开发时间没有统计学显著变化。在 238 种药物中,有 218 种(91.6%)有资格获得专利期限延长,其中 195 种(80.7%)有资格获得完整的 2 年延长。除了生物制剂,基于总体开发时间的变化,专利期限延长似乎没有道理。如果延长专利期限,还需要考虑增加支出的权衡。