Gupta Ravi, Bollyky Thomas J, Cohen Matthew, Ross Joseph S, Kesselheim Aaron S
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Global Health, Economics, and Development, Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, USA.
BMJ. 2018 Mar 19;360:k831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k831.
To evaluate whether off-patent prescription drugs at risk of sudden price increases or shortages in the United States are available from independent manufacturers approved in other well regulated settings around the world.
Observational study.
Off-patent drugs in the USA and approved by the Food and Drug Administration, up to 10 April 2017.
Novel tablet or capsule prescription drugs approved by the FDA since 1939 that were no longer protected by patents or other market exclusivity and had up to three generic versions.
Number of additional manufacturers that had obtained approval from any of seven non-US regulators with similar standards (European Medicines Agency (European Union), HealthCanada (Canada), Therapeutic Goods Association (Australia), Medsafe (New Zealand), Swissmedic (Switzerland), Medicines Control Council (South Africa), and the Israel Health Ministry). Association with drug characteristics including US orphan drug designation for drugs treating rare diseases, World Health Organization essential medicine designation, treatment area, drug product complexity (that is, with attributes that could complicate establishing bioequivalence or manufacturing), and total Medicaid spending in 2015.
Of 170 eligible study drugs, more than half (109, 64%) had at least one manufacturer approved by a non-US regulator and 32 (19%) had four or more. Among 44 (26%) drugs with no FDA approved generic versions, 21 (48%) were available from at least one manufacturer approved by one of the seven non-US regulators, and two (5%) by four or more manufacturers. Across all drugs and regulators (including the FDA), 66 (39%) drugs were available from four or more total manufacturers. Of 109 drugs with at least one non-US regulator approved manufacturer, 12 (11%) were approved for patients with rare diseases and 29 (27%) were WHO designated essential medicines; only 12 (11%) were complex products that might be more complicated to import. The highest numbers of drugs were indicated for treating cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia (19, 17%); psychiatric disease (16, 15%); and infectious diseases (15, 14%). In 2015, Medicaid alone spent nearly US$700m (£508m; €570m) on generic drugs without adequate US competition that could have had a manufacturer approved by non-US peer regulatory agencies.
In this study, more than half the off-patent drugs with no generic competition in the USA had at least one independent manufacturer approved by a non-US peer regulatory agency; slightly fewer than half had four or more total manufacturers. Facilitating US patient access to such manufacturers could help sustain affordable access to essential off-patent drugs.
评估在美国有突然涨价或短缺风险的专利过期处方药,是否可从世界其他监管完善地区获批的独立制造商处获得。
观察性研究。
截至2017年4月10日,美国食品药品监督管理局批准的专利过期药物。
自1939年以来美国食品药品监督管理局批准的新型片剂或胶囊处方药,这些药物不再受专利或其他市场独占权保护,且有多达三个仿制药版本。
已获得七个具有类似标准的非美国监管机构(欧洲药品管理局(欧盟)、加拿大卫生部(加拿大)、治疗用品管理局(澳大利亚)、新西兰药品安全局(新西兰)、瑞士医药管理局(瑞士)、药品控制委员会(南非)以及以色列卫生部)中任何一个批准的额外制造商数量。与药物特征的关联,包括用于治疗罕见病的美国孤儿药指定、世界卫生组织基本药物指定、治疗领域、药品复杂性(即具有可能使建立生物等效性或生产复杂化的属性)以及2015年医疗补助总支出。
在170种符合条件的研究药物中,超过一半(109种,64%)至少有一家制造商获得非美国监管机构批准,32种(19%)有四家或更多。在44种(26%)没有美国食品药品监督管理局批准的仿制药版本的药物中,21种(48%)可从七个非美国监管机构之一批准的至少一家制造商处获得,两种(5%)可从四家或更多制造商处获得。在所有药物和监管机构(包括美国食品药品监督管理局)中,66种(39%)药物可从四家或更多制造商处获得。在109种至少有一家非美国监管机构批准制造商的药物中,12种(11%)被批准用于罕见病患者,29种(27%)是世界卫生组织指定的基本药物;只有12种(11%)是可能更难进口的复杂产品。用于治疗心血管疾病、糖尿病或高脂血症的药物数量最多(各19种,占17%);精神疾病(16种,占15%);以及传染病(15种,占14%)。2015年,仅医疗补助就花费了近7亿美元(5.08亿英镑;5.7亿欧元)用于在美国没有充分竞争的仿制药,而这些仿制药本可有经非美国同行监管机构批准的制造商。
在本研究中,在美国没有仿制药竞争的专利过期药物中,超过一半至少有一家独立制造商获得非美国同行监管机构批准;总数略少于一半有四家或更多制造商。促进美国患者获取此类制造商的产品有助于维持对基本专利过期药物的可负担获取。