Suppr超能文献

哪些因素与激进化风险真正相关?对英国样本进行的二次数据分析。

What factors are truly associated with risk for radicalisation? A secondary data analysis within a UK sample.

作者信息

Ahearn Elizabeth-Rose, Bhui Kamaldeep, Jones Edgar

机构信息

University of New South Wales, Australia.

Queen Mary University of London, UK.

出版信息

Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):645-653. doi: 10.1177/1363461520933755. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

Abstract

Radicalisation and extremist violence are of increasing concern internationally. The unconventional, decentralised, and transnational nature of modern terrorism involves an active process of radicalisation requiring national security responses to reflect findings from recent empirical research. This study aims to identify factors that relate to extremist attitudes and potential vulnerability to radicalisation in order to inform preventative action. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of a representative population sample of men and women aged 18-45 of Muslim heritage recruited by quota sampling in two English cities. Logistic regressions were performed on a seven-item dichotomised measure based on our previously developed scale of 'sympathy for terrorist acts'. Scores representing 'non-condemnation of these acts' were deemed to represent risk for radicalisation. Thirteen respondents had a positive score on the sympathy for terrorism measure (2.4%), 39 scored zero (6.41%) and the remainder (91.4%) had a negative score representing condemnation of terrorist acts. There was a significant association between sympathy for terrorism and belonging to the local or global Muslim community, anxiety, and support for the use of defensive violence. Gender, religious identity, country of birth, belief in Sharia law, the importance of religion in life, and mosque attendance were all not associated with sympathy for terrorism. The results contribute to an understanding of the radicalisation process and have potential value in developing preventative public health interventions.

摘要

激进化和极端暴力在国际上日益受到关注。现代恐怖主义具有非常规、分散和跨国的性质,涉及一个积极的激进化过程,这就要求国家安全应对措施能够反映近期实证研究的结果。本研究旨在确定与极端主义态度以及激进化潜在易感性相关的因素,以便为预防行动提供依据。通过配额抽样,在英国两个城市对年龄在18至45岁、具有穆斯林血统的男女代表性人群样本进行了横断面调查。基于我们之前制定的“对恐怖主义行为的同情”量表,对一项七项二分法测量进行了逻辑回归分析。代表“不谴责这些行为”的分数被视为代表激进化风险。13名受访者在恐怖主义同情测量中得分为阳性(2.4%),39人得分为零(6.41%),其余(91.4%)得分为阴性,表示谴责恐怖主义行为。对恐怖主义的同情与属于当地或全球穆斯林社区、焦虑以及对使用防御性暴力的支持之间存在显著关联。性别、宗教身份、出生国家、对伊斯兰教法的信仰、宗教在生活中的重要性以及清真寺礼拜次数均与对恐怖主义的同情无关。这些结果有助于理解激进化过程,并且在制定预防性公共卫生干预措施方面具有潜在价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验