• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素与激进化风险真正相关?对英国样本进行的二次数据分析。

What factors are truly associated with risk for radicalisation? A secondary data analysis within a UK sample.

作者信息

Ahearn Elizabeth-Rose, Bhui Kamaldeep, Jones Edgar

机构信息

University of New South Wales, Australia.

Queen Mary University of London, UK.

出版信息

Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):645-653. doi: 10.1177/1363461520933755. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1177/1363461520933755
PMID:32611222
Abstract

Radicalisation and extremist violence are of increasing concern internationally. The unconventional, decentralised, and transnational nature of modern terrorism involves an active process of radicalisation requiring national security responses to reflect findings from recent empirical research. This study aims to identify factors that relate to extremist attitudes and potential vulnerability to radicalisation in order to inform preventative action. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of a representative population sample of men and women aged 18-45 of Muslim heritage recruited by quota sampling in two English cities. Logistic regressions were performed on a seven-item dichotomised measure based on our previously developed scale of 'sympathy for terrorist acts'. Scores representing 'non-condemnation of these acts' were deemed to represent risk for radicalisation. Thirteen respondents had a positive score on the sympathy for terrorism measure (2.4%), 39 scored zero (6.41%) and the remainder (91.4%) had a negative score representing condemnation of terrorist acts. There was a significant association between sympathy for terrorism and belonging to the local or global Muslim community, anxiety, and support for the use of defensive violence. Gender, religious identity, country of birth, belief in Sharia law, the importance of religion in life, and mosque attendance were all not associated with sympathy for terrorism. The results contribute to an understanding of the radicalisation process and have potential value in developing preventative public health interventions.

摘要

激进化和极端暴力在国际上日益受到关注。现代恐怖主义具有非常规、分散和跨国的性质,涉及一个积极的激进化过程,这就要求国家安全应对措施能够反映近期实证研究的结果。本研究旨在确定与极端主义态度以及激进化潜在易感性相关的因素,以便为预防行动提供依据。通过配额抽样,在英国两个城市对年龄在18至45岁、具有穆斯林血统的男女代表性人群样本进行了横断面调查。基于我们之前制定的“对恐怖主义行为的同情”量表,对一项七项二分法测量进行了逻辑回归分析。代表“不谴责这些行为”的分数被视为代表激进化风险。13名受访者在恐怖主义同情测量中得分为阳性(2.4%),39人得分为零(6.41%),其余(91.4%)得分为阴性,表示谴责恐怖主义行为。对恐怖主义的同情与属于当地或全球穆斯林社区、焦虑以及对使用防御性暴力的支持之间存在显著关联。性别、宗教身份、出生国家、对伊斯兰教法的信仰、宗教在生活中的重要性以及清真寺礼拜次数均与对恐怖主义的同情无关。这些结果有助于理解激进化过程,并且在制定预防性公共卫生干预措施方面具有潜在价值。

相似文献

1
What factors are truly associated with risk for radicalisation? A secondary data analysis within a UK sample.哪些因素与激进化风险真正相关?对英国样本进行的二次数据分析。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):645-653. doi: 10.1177/1363461520933755. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Might depression, psychosocial adversity, and limited social assets explain vulnerability to and resistance against violent radicalisation?抑郁症、心理社会逆境和有限的社会资源能否解释对暴力极端化的易感性和抵抗力?
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e105918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105918. eCollection 2014.
3
Assessing risks of violent extremism in depressive disorders: Developing and validating a new measure of Sympathies for Violent Protest and Terrorism.评估抑郁障碍中的暴力极端主义风险:开发和验证一种新的暴力抗议和恐怖主义共鸣度量表。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;54(11):1078-1085. doi: 10.1177/0004867420944520. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
4
Is violent radicalisation associated with poverty, migration, poor self-reported health and common mental disorders?暴力极端化与贫困、移民、自我报告的健康状况不佳和常见精神障碍有关吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090718. eCollection 2014.
5
Criminal justice interventions for preventing radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism: An evidence and gap map.预防激进化、暴力极端主义和恐怖主义的刑事司法干预措施:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 14;19(4):e1366. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1366. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Extremism, religion and psychiatric morbidity in a population-based sample of young men.基于人群的年轻男性样本中的极端主义、宗教与精神疾病发病率
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;209(6):491-497. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.186510. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
7
Multiagency programs with police as a partner for reducing radicalisation to violence.以警察为合作伙伴的多机构项目,旨在减少激进化至暴力行为的情况。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;17(2):e1162. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1162. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Radicalisation and mental health.激进化与心理健康。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;72(sup1):S16-S19. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1525640. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
[Radicalisation and geopolitics, the pathways to violence].[激进化与地缘政治:通往暴力之路]
Soins. 2017 Oct;62(819):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.soin.2017.08.005.
10
Towards a fruitful concept of radicalisation: a synthesis.迈向一个富有成效的激进化概念:一种综合。
J Contemp Eur Stud. 2023 Mar 1;32(3):610-624. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2023.2185594. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors.认知与行为激进化:对假定风险因素和保护因素的系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;17(3):e1174. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1174. eCollection 2021 Sep.