• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强型术前康复对食管癌患者行食管癌切除术的疗效。

Efficacy of enhanced prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2021 Jan;18(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00757-2. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-020-00757-2
PMID:32613327
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that prehabilitation helps reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. In this study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of enhanced prehabilitation (EP) in the hospital for patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 48 consecutive patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction between September 2015 and June 2019. EP program had been introduced in August 2017. In the EP group, patients received the EP program during hospitalization 7 days before surgery in addition to conventional perioperative rehabilitation. The EP program consisted of aerobic exercise and muscle strength training in the morning and afternoon. Operative outcomes were compared between patients who received EP (EP group; 23 patients) and patients who did not receive EP (control group; 25 patients).

RESULTS

The preoperative (EP group vs. control group, 492.9 ± 79.7 vs. 418.9 ± 71.8 m, p < 0.001) and postoperative (EP group vs. control group, 431.5 ± 80 vs. 378 ± 68.7 m, p < 0.001) 6-min walk distance was significantly higher in the EP group than in the control group. The respiratory complications rate was significantly lower in the EP group (4.3%) than in the control group (36%) (p = 0.007). The incidence of atelectasis was particularly significantly lower in the EP group (0%) than in the control group (24%) (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

EP was performed safely for patients before esophagectomy. EP improved the exercise tolerance of the patients before esophagectomy and might be useful in preventing respiratory complications.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,术前康复有助于降低术后并发症的发生率。本研究旨在探讨增强型术前康复(EP)在食管癌患者住院期间的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 9 月至 2019 年 6 月期间 48 例接受根治性食管切除术和胃管重建术的连续患者的数据。2017 年 8 月引入 EP 方案。在 EP 组中,患者在手术前 7 天在医院接受 EP 方案治疗,同时接受常规围手术期康复。EP 方案包括上午和下午的有氧运动和肌肉力量训练。比较接受 EP(EP 组;23 例)和未接受 EP(对照组;25 例)的患者的手术结果。

结果

EP 组患者术前(EP 组 vs. 对照组,492.9±79.7 vs. 418.9±71.8 m,p<0.001)和术后(EP 组 vs. 对照组,431.5±80 vs. 378±68.7 m,p<0.001)6 分钟步行距离明显高于对照组。EP 组患者呼吸系统并发症发生率明显低于对照组(4.3% vs. 36%,p=0.007)。EP 组患者肺不张发生率明显低于对照组(0% vs. 24%,p=0.012)。

结论

EP 方案在食管癌患者术前安全实施。EP 方案提高了患者术前的运动耐量,可能有助于预防呼吸系统并发症。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of enhanced prehabilitation for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy.增强型术前康复对食管癌患者行食管癌切除术的疗效。
Esophagus. 2021 Jan;18(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00757-2. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on postoperative recovery and morbidity in patients undergoing a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy.多模式术前康复计划对完全微创食管切除术患者术后恢复及并发症的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Jul 12;35(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab082.
3
Does prehabilitation before esophagectomy improve postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.术前康复是否能改善食管癌术后结局?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Feb 29;37(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doad066.
4
Effectiveness of intervention with a perioperative multidisciplinary support team for radical esophagectomy.围手术期多学科支持团队干预对根治性食管切除术的有效性。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Dec;25(12):3733-3739. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3801-x. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Preoperative six-minute walk distance as a predictor of postoperative complication in patients with esophageal cancer.术前六分钟步行距离可预测食管癌患者术后并发症。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Mar 5;33(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz050.
6
[Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[Sweet术式与Ivor-Lewis术式治疗中下段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):979-984.
7
Efficacy of perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.围手术期免疫营养支持在食管癌患者食管切除术中的疗效。
Nutrition. 2019 Mar;59:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
Sarcopenia, the depletion of muscle mass, an independent predictor of respiratory complications after oncological esophagectomy.肌肉减少症,即肌肉量的消耗,是肿瘤食管切除术后发生呼吸系统并发症的独立预测因素。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Mar 1;32(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy092.
9
[Impact of gastric tube diameter on quality of life of esophagus cancer patient after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy].[胃管直径对Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术后食管癌患者生活质量的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 25;21(9):1001-1007.
10
Hand grip strength as a predictor of postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.握力作为接受食管癌切除术的食管癌患者术后并发症的预测指标。
Esophagus. 2018 Jan;15(1):10-18. doi: 10.1007/s10388-017-0587-3. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical fitness predicts post-esophagectomy complications after chemoradiotherapy: a pilot study.体能可预测放化疗后食管切除术后的并发症:一项初步研究。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 30;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01158-7.
2
Boosting recovery before surgery: The impact of prehabilitation on upper gastrointestinal cancer patients - A quantitative comparative analysis.术前促进康复:术前康复对上消化道癌症患者的影响——定量比较分析
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0315734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315734. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
单一模式或多模式术前康复对行食管胃交界癌手术患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;32(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08229-w.
4
Measurement and optimization of perioperative risk among patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.测量和优化食管癌手术患者的围手术期风险。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Feb 29;37(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doad062.
5
Effect of Three Weeks of High-Intensity, Long-Term Preoperative Rehabilitation for Esophageal Cancer Patients with Stroke Sequelae Who Were Considered Unfit for Surgery Due to Low Activity: A Case Report.针对因活动能力低下被认为不适宜手术的食管癌合并中风后遗症患者,进行为期三周的高强度长期术前康复治疗的效果:一例报告
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;11(5):665. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050665.
6
The Role of Age and Comorbidities in Esophagogastric Cancer Chemoradiation of the Frail Elderly (>70 Years): An Analysis from a Tertiary High Volume-Center.年龄和合并症在老年体弱(>70岁)食管癌和胃癌放化疗中的作用:来自大型三级中心的分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;15(1):106. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010106.
7
Perspectives on the Direction of Cancer Prehabilitation in the Pandemic and Beyond.大流行期间及之后癌症术前康复的发展方向展望
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Dec;4(4):100236. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100236. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
Impact of preoperative skeletal muscle mass and physical performance on short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy.术前骨骼肌质量和身体机能对食管癌患者食管切除术后短期和长期预后的影响。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Mar 8;6(5):623-632. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12560. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Does VOpeak Provide a Prognostic Value in Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy for Post-operative Outcomes?胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术和胃癌根治术的 VOpeak 值与术后转归的关系
In Vivo. 2022 Jul-Aug;36(4):1812-1819. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12897.
10
Trajectories of Health-Related Quality of Life, Health Literacy, and Self-Efficacy in Curatively-Treated Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Longitudinal Single-Center Study in Italy.食管癌根治性治疗患者健康相关生活质量、健康素养和自我效能的轨迹:意大利一项纵向单中心研究
J Patient Exp. 2021 Nov 29;8:23743735211060769. doi: 10.1177/23743735211060769. eCollection 2021.