McCarthy R A, Warrington E K
National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, London, UK.
Nature. 1988 Aug 4;334(6181):428-30. doi: 10.1038/334428a0.
Patients with cerebral lesions offer a unique opportunity to investigate the organization of meaning systems in the brain. Clinical neurologists have long been aware that knowledge of particular classes or categories of information may be selectively impaired in some cases and selectively spared in others. For example knowledge of letters, colours, objects, or people may be lost as a consequence of damage to the left hemisphere of the brain. Recently there has been quantitative evidence for even more specific impairment and preservation of particular classes of knowledge. More recently the evidence for knowledge of living things as compared with inanimate objects is particularly striking. Such observations have suggested that our semantic knowledge base is categorical in its organization. In this preliminary report, we describe a patient whose semantic knowledge deficit was not only category specific, but also modality specific. Although his knowledge of the visual world was almost entirely normal, his knowledge of living things (but not objects!) was gravely impaired when assessed in the verbal domain. These findings call into question the widely accepted view that the brain has a single all-purpose meaning store.
患有脑部病变的患者为研究大脑中意义系统的组织提供了独特的机会。临床神经学家早就意识到,特定类别或范畴的信息知识在某些情况下可能会被选择性地损害,而在其他情况下则会被选择性地保留。例如,字母、颜色、物体或人物的知识可能会因大脑左半球受损而丧失。最近,有定量证据表明特定类别的知识存在更具体的损害和保留情况。最近,与无生命物体相比,关于生物的知识的证据尤为显著。这些观察结果表明,我们的语义知识库在组织上是分类的。在这份初步报告中,我们描述了一位患者,其语义知识缺陷不仅是类别特异性的,也是模态特异性的。尽管他对视觉世界的知识几乎完全正常,但在言语领域进行评估时,他对生物(而非物体!)的知识严重受损。这些发现对大脑有一个单一通用意义存储库这一被广泛接受的观点提出了质疑。