• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Functional Fixedness in Creative Thinking Tasks Depends on Stimulus Modality.创造性思维任务中的功能固着取决于刺激方式。
Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2016 Nov;10(4):425-435. doi: 10.1037/aca0000050. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Neural basis of functional fixedness during creative idea generation: An EEG study.创造性思维产生过程中功能固着的神经基础:一项 EEG 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
3
Semantic search during divergent thinking.发散性思维过程中的语义搜索。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:344-357. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
4
Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking.情节检索的神经机制支持发散性创造性思维。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jan 1;29(1):150-166. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx312.
5
How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm.我该如何使用它?功能固着在生存加工范式中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):324-332. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01802-y.
6
Revealing the Role of Divergent Thinking and Fluid Intelligence in Children's Semantic Memory Organization.揭示发散性思维和流体智力在儿童语义记忆组织中的作用。
J Intell. 2020 Dec 14;8(4):43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8040043.
7
An ERP study of passive creative conceptual expansion using a modified alternate uses task.一项使用改良型替代用途任务的被动创造性概念扩展的 ERP 研究。
Brain Res. 2013 Aug 21;1527:189-98. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings.性别差异在创造性思维中的体现:行为和 fMRI 的研究发现。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2014 Mar;8(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s11682-013-9241-4.
9
Use or Consequences: Probing the Cognitive Difference Between Two Measures of Divergent Thinking.用途或后果:探究发散性思维两种测量方法之间的认知差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02327. eCollection 2018.
10
Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking.遗忘作为创造性思维的结果和促成因素。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1594-609. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000006. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic memory and creative evaluation.语义记忆与创造性评估。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;13(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x.
2
Sparking creativity: Encouraging creative idea generation through automatically generated word recommendations.激发创造力:通过自动生成的单词推荐来鼓励创意的产生。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7939-7962. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Default mode network electrophysiological dynamics and causal role in creative thinking.静息态默认网络电生理动力学及其在创造性思维中的因果作用。
Brain. 2024 Oct 3;147(10):3409-3425. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae199.
4
Controlling stimulus ambiguity reduces spurious creative ideation variance in a cyclic adaptation of the alternative uses task.控制刺激的模糊性可以减少在交替用途任务的循环适应中虚假的创造性思维差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63225-2.
5
Memory and creativity: A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between memory systems and creative cognition.记忆与创造力:记忆系统与创造性认知关系的元分析研究
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2116-2154. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02303-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Semantic Memory and Creativity: The Costs and Benefits of Semantic Memory Structure in Generating Original Ideas.语义记忆与创造力:语义记忆结构在产生原创想法中的成本与收益
Think Reason. 2023;29(2):305-339. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2022.2076742. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
Divergent semantic integration (DSI): Extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling.发散语义整合(DSI):通过分布语义建模从叙事中提取创造力。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3726-3759. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01986-2. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
A novel coding scheme for assessing responses in divergent thinking: An embodied approach.一种用于评估发散性思维反应的新型编码方案:一种具身方法。
Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2021 Aug;15(3):412-425. doi: 10.1037/aca0000297. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Noninvasive brain stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex alters the novelty of creative idea generation.经外侧前额叶皮层的无创性脑刺激改变了创意生成的新颖性。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr;21(2):311-326. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00869-x. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
10
The Influence of Situational Cues on Children's Creativity in an Alternative Uses Task and the Moderating Effect of Selective Attention.情境线索对儿童在替代用途任务中的创造力的影响以及选择性注意的调节作用。
J Intell. 2020 Oct 19;8(4):37. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8040037.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: implications from "optic aphasia".视觉和语义处理的认知和神经机制:来自“失读症”的启示。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Fall;7(4):457-78. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.4.457.
2
I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction.我能看出你在做什么:动作熟悉度和可供性促进了消退的恢复。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Jun 1;23(4):583-605. doi: 10.1080/02643290500310962.
3
Graded modality-specific specialisation in semantics: A computational account of optic aphasia.语义的分级模态特异性专业化:失读症的计算说明。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Oct 1;19(7):603-39. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000112.
4
Positive transfer and negative transfer/antilearning of problem-solving skills.解决问题技能的正迁移和负迁移/反学习
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Feb;137(1):97-115. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.97.
5
A within-modality test of semantic knowledge: The Size/Weight Attribute Test.
Neuropsychology. 2007 Nov;21(6):803-11. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.6.803.
6
Selective activation around the left occipito-temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: individual variability or false positives?相对于图片,单词在左侧枕颞沟周围的选择性激活:个体差异还是假阳性?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Aug;29(8):986-1000. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20443.
7
Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects.发散性思维:生成常见物体新用途的策略与执行参与
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):611-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x.
8
When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance.当鞋子变成锤子:目标导向的分类训练可提高解决问题的能力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):935-42. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.935.
9
Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1134-48. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1134.
10
Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.物体操作知识与功能知识之间的区别:来自功能磁共振成像的证据。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):361-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 7.

创造性思维任务中的功能固着取决于刺激方式。

Functional Fixedness in Creative Thinking Tasks Depends on Stimulus Modality.

作者信息

Chrysikou Evangelia G, Motyka Katharine, Nigro Cristina, Yang Song-I, Thompson-Schill Sharon L

机构信息

University of Kansas; University of Pennsylvania.

University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2016 Nov;10(4):425-435. doi: 10.1037/aca0000050. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1037/aca0000050
PMID:28344724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5365093/
Abstract

Pictorial examples during creative thinking tasks can lead participants to fixate on these examples and reproduce their elements even when yielding suboptimal creative products. Semantic memory research may illuminate the cognitive processes underlying this effect. Here, we examined whether pictures and words differentially influence access to semantic knowledge for object concepts depending on whether the task is close- or open-ended. Participants viewed either names or pictures of everyday objects, or a combination of the two, and generated common, secondary, or ad hoc uses for them. Stimulus modality effects were assessed quantitatively through reaction times and qualitatively through a novel coding system, which classifies creative output on a continuum from top-down-driven to bottom-up-driven responses. Both analyses revealed differences across tasks. Importantly, for ad hoc uses, participants exposed to pictures generated more top-down-driven responses than those exposed to object names. These findings have implications for accounts of functional fixedness in creative thinking, as well as theories of semantic memory for object concepts.

摘要

在创造性思维任务中,图片示例可能会导致参与者专注于这些示例并重现其元素,即使产生的是次优的创造性产物。语义记忆研究可能会阐明这种效应背后的认知过程。在此,我们研究了图片和文字是否会根据任务是封闭式还是开放式而对物体概念的语义知识获取产生不同影响。参与者观看日常物体的名称、图片或两者的组合,并为它们生成常见、次要或临时用途。通过反应时间对刺激模态效应进行定量评估,并通过一种新颖的编码系统进行定性评估,该系统将创造性输出从自上而下驱动到自下而上驱动的反应进行连续分类。两项分析均揭示了不同任务之间的差异。重要的是,对于临时用途,接触图片的参与者比接触物体名称的参与者产生了更多自上而下驱动的反应。这些发现对创造性思维中的功能固着理论以及物体概念的语义记忆理论具有启示意义。