• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难治性癫痫持续状态下深度镇静相关的长期预后。

Long-term prognosis related to deep sedation in refractory status Epilepticus.

机构信息

Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Dec;142(6):555-562. doi: 10.1111/ane.13302. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1111/ane.13302
PMID:32614067
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term prognosis in patients with refractory status epilepticus according to the level of sedation reached during drug-induced coma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Longitudinal study of patients with status epilepticus who received anesthetics to induce therapeutic coma. Demographic data, clinical, and electroencephalographic characteristics were collected, as well as variables related to sedation. We considered as deep sedation the EEG burst-suppression patterns (suppression ratio > 50%). A GOSE (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended) score of 7 or 8 was considered as good prognosis. A comparative study was carried out to identify predictors of good or poor prognosis at discharge, at 1 and 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

We included 61 patients: 63.9% were men; mean age 53.5 ± 16.8 years (range 16-86 years), 39.3% reached deep sedation; 62.3% had > 48 h induced coma. The median hospital stay was 21 days, while 10 days in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the multiple regression analysis, an ICU length of stay ≥ 7 days was associated with poor prognosis at discharge and at long-term (P < .05), while deep sedation was associated only with poor long-term prognosis (1 and 2 years, P < .05). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed higher survival in the group that did not undergo deep sedation (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In refractory status epilepticus, deep sedation is associated with poor prognosis at long-term.

摘要

目的

根据药物诱导昏迷期间达到的镇静水平评估难治性癫痫持续状态患者的长期预后。

材料和方法

对接受麻醉剂诱导治疗性昏迷的癫痫持续状态患者进行纵向研究。收集人口统计学数据、临床和脑电图特征以及与镇静相关的变量。我们将脑电图爆发抑制模式(抑制比>50%)视为深度镇静。格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)7 或 8 分为良好预后。进行了一项比较研究,以确定出院时、1 年和 2 年随访时良好或不良预后的预测因素。

结果

我们纳入了 61 名患者:63.9%为男性;平均年龄 53.5±16.8 岁(16-86 岁),39.3%达到深度镇静;62.3%诱导昏迷时间>48 小时。中位数住院时间为 21 天,重症监护病房(ICU)为 10 天。在多因素回归分析中,ICU 住院时间≥7 天与出院和长期预后不良相关(P<.05),而深度镇静仅与长期预后不良相关(1 年和 2 年,P<.05)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示未进行深度镇静的患者生存率更高(P<.05)。

结论

在难治性癫痫持续状态中,深度镇静与长期预后不良相关。

相似文献

1
Long-term prognosis related to deep sedation in refractory status Epilepticus.难治性癫痫持续状态下深度镇静相关的长期预后。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Dec;142(6):555-562. doi: 10.1111/ane.13302. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
Induction of burst suppression or coma using intravenous anesthetics in refractory status epilepticus.在难治性癫痫持续状态中使用静脉麻醉剂诱导爆发抑制或昏迷。
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 May;22(5):854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
3
Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis.难治性癫痫持续状态:治疗积极性对预后的影响。
Arch Neurol. 2005 Nov;62(11):1698-702. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.11.1698.
4
Which anesthetic should be used in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus?治疗难治性癫痫持续状态应使用哪种麻醉剂?
Epilepsia. 2007;48 Suppl 8:52-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01350.x.
5
[Drug treatment of refractory status epilepticus].[难治性癫痫持续状态的药物治疗]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2009 Apr;165(4):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
6
Midazolam fails to prevent neurological damage in children with convulsive refractory febrile status epilepticus.咪达唑仑无法预防惊厥性难治性热性癫痫持续状态患儿的神经损伤。
Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Jul;51(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
Propofol in the management of refractory status epilepticus: a case report.丙泊酚用于难治性癫痫持续状态的治疗:一例病例报告
Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(2):148-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01707672.
8
Refractory status epilepticus.难治性癫痫持续状态
J Palliat Med. 2004 Feb;7(1):85-8. doi: 10.1089/109662104322737331.
9
Frequency of non-convulsive seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients in need of controlled ventilation and sedation.需要控制通气和镇静的蛛网膜下腔出血患者中非惊厥性发作和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的频率。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Dec;17(3):367-73. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9771-4.
10
A randomized trial for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.一项治疗耐药性癫痫持续状态的随机试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2011 Feb;14(1):4-10. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9445-z.

引用本文的文献

1
New onset refractory status epilepticus: Long-term outcomes beyond seizures.新发难治性癫痫持续状态:癫痫发作之外的长期预后
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr;66(4):988-1005. doi: 10.1111/epi.18267. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Status epilepticus in the ICU.重症监护病房中的癫痫持续状态。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;50(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07263-w. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
The Origin of the Burst-Suppression Paradigm in Treatment of Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态治疗中爆发-抑制范式的起源。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Jun;40(3):849-854. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01877-0. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
Isoflurane in (Super-) Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter Evaluation.七氟醚治疗(超)难治性癫痫持续状态的多中心评估。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):631-639. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01250-z. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
[Pharmacotherapy and intensive care aspects of status epilepticus: update 2020/2021].[癫痫持续状态的药物治疗与重症监护要点:2020/2021年更新]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Oct;70(10):874-887. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01000-y. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Pharmacotherapy for Nonconvulsive Seizures and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus.非惊厥性癫痫发作和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的药物治疗。
Drugs. 2021 May;81(7):749-770. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01502-4. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
7
Pearls and Pitfalls of Introducing Ketogenic Diet in Adult Status Epilepticus: A Practical Guide for the Intensivist.成人癫痫持续状态中引入生酮饮食的要点与陷阱:重症监护医生实用指南
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 22;10(4):881. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040881.