Monte Felipe Alves, Melo Paulo Sergio, Alves Amaro, Oliveira Junior José Venâncio, Alencar George, Soares Fabio Couto
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital da Restauração Governador Paulo Guerra, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Materno Infantil de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Jun;55(3):360-366. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701289. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
To measure the mean value of the Southwick angle using two different methods, the manual (1) and digital (2) methods, and to establish a normality value. A primarily descriptive study with 100 children and adolescents. Individuals with orthopedic complaints regarding the hips and/or knees or gait alterations were excluded. For each patient, an X-ray was performed on the lateral incidence of Lowenstein, totaling 100 radiographs and 200 hips. The Southwick angle was measured in two different ways by the same researcher: the conventional method (1), tracing the lines with pencils and measuring the angle with the use of a goniometer and negatoscope, and through the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP) image editor (open source), version 2.7.0 (2), in which the lines were plotted and the angles of both hips were gauged on each radiograph. Later, we sought to evaluate the correlation between the two methods and to verify the mean Southwick angle by categorically correlating it by gender, age group and body mass index (BMI) in asymptomatic children and adolescents. All radiographs were authorized by the children and adolescents' parents/legal guardians. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the institutions in which the research was conducted. The mean of the Southwick angles obtained by the conventional method was of 8.7° (±2.0°), and, by the digital method, it was of 9.9° (±1.8°). The angle obtained by the two methods was statistically significant ( < 0.001). The majority of the studied population (95%) had a body mass index (BMI) > 18.5, and the mean of the angles was within the previously established value (∼ 10°). For the first time, using a substantial sample size, a normal value for the Southwick angle measured in asymptomatic individuals was demonstrated. In addition, the image editor proved to be a reliable method to measuring the Southwick angle.
采用两种不同方法(手动方法(1)和数字方法(2))测量Southwick角的平均值,并确定其正常参考值。
对100名儿童和青少年进行一项主要的描述性研究。排除有髋部和/或膝部骨科问题或步态改变的个体。对每位患者进行Lowenstein侧位X线检查,共获得100张X线片和200个髋关节影像。由同一位研究人员用两种不同方式测量Southwick角:传统方法(1),用铅笔描绘线条并用测角仪和观片灯测量角度;以及通过GNU图像处理程序(GIMP)图像编辑器(开源),版本2.7.0(2),在每张X线片上绘制线条并测量双侧髋关节的角度。之后,我们试图评估两种方法之间的相关性,并通过按性别、年龄组和体重指数(BMI)对无症状儿童和青少年的Southwick角平均值进行分类关联分析来验证其平均值。所有X线片均获得儿童和青少年父母/法定监护人的授权。该研究获得了开展研究所在机构伦理委员会的批准。
传统方法测得的Southwick角平均值为8.7°(±2.0°),数字方法测得的平均值为9.9°(±1.8°)。两种方法测得的角度具有统计学显著性差异(P<0.001)。大多数研究对象(95%)的体重指数(BMI)>18.5,角度平均值在先前确定的值(约10°)范围内。
首次通过大量样本量证明了无症状个体中Southwick角的正常参考值。此外,图像编辑器被证明是测量Southwick角的可靠方法。