Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2415-2424. doi: 10.1111/jce.14648. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
To improve the mechanistic understanding of spontaneous initiation of ventricular fibrillation (VF), we characterized the patterns of premature ventricular complex (PVC) preceding spontaneous VF in primary and secondary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients.
A single-center, cross-sectional analysis of 1209 patients with primary and secondary prevention ICD identified 190 patients who received ICD therapy (firing or antitachycardia pacing) for VF or monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT). Initiation was quantified by the coupling interval (CI), the cycle length immediately preceding the CI (CL(-1)), the CI corrected by CL(-1) using Fridericia's formula (CIc), and the prematurity index (PI). In both VF (n = 44; 23%) and MMVT (n = 134; 71%), the most common pattern of initiation was late-coupled PVC, followed by the short-long-short pattern. The parameters such as pre-initiation median CL, CL(-1), CI, and PI were not significantly different between VF and MMVT for any patterns. At least some events (45% of VF and 63% of MMVT) had extremely long CIs beyond the QTc cut-off estimated from the CL(-1), suggestive of initiation by a train of multiple PVCs or nonsustained VT instead of a single PVC.
Some spontaneous VF events in ICD recipients appear to be initiated by a train of multiple PVC or nonsustained VT rather than a single PVC. This finding indicates that patterns of a single PVC are not an important determinant of VF initiation and thus account for conflicting results in previous studies.
为了提高对心室颤动(VF)自发性发作的机制理解,我们对原发性和继发性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者自发性 VF 前的室性期前收缩(PVC)模式进行了特征描述。
对 1209 例接受原发性和继发性 ICD 的患者进行的单中心、横断面分析中,有 190 例患者因 VF 或单形性室性心动过速(MMVT)而接受 ICD 治疗(放电或抗心动过速起搏)。通过耦合间期(CI)、紧随 CI 之前的周期长度(CL(-1))、使用 Fridericia 公式校正的 CI(CIc)和过早指数(PI)来量化起始。在 VF(n=44;23%)和 MMVT(n=134;71%)中,最常见的起始模式是晚耦 PVC,其次是短-长-短模式。在任何模式下,VF 和 MMVT 之间的起始前中位数 CL、CL(-1)、CI 和 PI 等参数均无显著差异。至少某些事件(45%的 VF 和 63%的 MMVT)具有超出根据 CL(-1) 估计的 QTc 截止值的极长 CI,提示由多个 PVC 或非持续性 VT 引起的一连串激动,而不是单个 PVC。
在 ICD 接受者中,一些自发性 VF 事件似乎是由一连串 PVC 或非持续性 VT 而非单个 PVC 引发的。这一发现表明单个 PVC 的模式不是 VF 起始的重要决定因素,从而解释了以前研究中的冲突结果。