Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, 164, World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Republic of Korea, 16499.
Neuroradiology. 2020 Nov;62(11):1451-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02485-x. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
We compared the diagnostic performance of CT texture analysis in single-phase CT scan with that of conventional enhancement pattern analysis in a two-phase CT scan for discrimination of salivary gland tumors, Warthin tumor (WT) from pleomorphic adenoma (PA).
One hundred seventy-eight patients with PA and 84 patients with WT were selected and CT texture analysis was separately performed on early (40s) and delayed (180s) phases, after injection of the contrast agent, using commercially available software. The attenuation changes and enhancement patterns were visually and quantitatively assessed with Hounsfield units (HU). Differences between PAs and WTs were analyzed using χ test and independent t test. Diagnostic performance of texture parameters in single-phase CT was compared with that of dynamic enhancement pattern in two-phase CT using the McNemar test.
Ratio of tumoral HU (delayed phase/early phase) was significantly higher in PAs compared with WTs (p < 0.001). Tumor heterogeneity parameters, standard deviation (SD) and entropy, were significantly lower in WTs regardless of the type of filter used (p ≤ 0.001). Mean with coarse filter (AUC = 0.944) on early phase scan and entropy with medium filter (AUC = 0.901) on delayed scan were best discriminators between PAs and WTs. Diagnostic accuracy of mean (90.5%) on early scan and entropy (84.7%) on delayed scan was not significantly different from the accuracy (89.3%) of conventional wash-out pattern for distinguishing WTs from PAs (p = 0.742, p = 0.088, respectively).
Diagnostic performance of texture parameters was similar to that of quantitative enhancement pattern for differentiating WTs from PAs, with the advantage in lower radiation exposure.
我们比较了单期 CT 扫描 CT 纹理分析与双期 CT 扫描增强模式分析在鉴别涎腺肿瘤(Warthin 瘤[WT]与多形性腺瘤[PA])中的诊断性能。
选择 178 例 PA 和 84 例 WT 患者,分别对增强剂注射后早期(40s)和延迟期(180s)进行 CT 纹理分析,使用商用软件。采用 HU 视觉和定量评估衰减变化和增强模式。采用卡方检验和独立 t 检验分析 PA 和 WT 之间的差异。采用 McNemar 检验比较单期 CT 纹理参数和双期 CT 动态增强模式的诊断性能。
PA 的肿瘤 HU 比值(延迟期/早期期)显著高于 WT(p<0.001)。使用任何滤波器,WT 的肿瘤异质性参数标准差(SD)和熵均显著降低(p≤0.001)。粗滤均值(AUC=0.944)在早期扫描、中滤熵(AUC=0.901)在延迟扫描时对区分 PA 和 WT 最好。早期扫描均值(90.5%)和延迟扫描熵(84.7%)的诊断准确性与传统洗脱模式(89.3%)鉴别 WT 与 PA 的准确性无显著差异(p=0.742,p=0.088)。
纹理参数的诊断性能与定量增强模式相似,有助于鉴别 WT 与 PA,且具有较低的辐射暴露优势。