Evancho A M, Stiles R G, Fajman W A, Flower S P, Macha T, Brunner M C, Fleming L
Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Clinic, Atlanta, GA 30322.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Oct;151(4):751-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.151.4.751.
Thirty-one symptomatic patients were studied with MR imaging to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of shoulder MR in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Correlative studies included arthroscopy in 19 patients and arthrography in 12 patients. Images were obtained on either a 0.5- or 1.5-T Philips superconducting magnet using spin-echo pulse sequences (650-850/30 [TR, TE], 2000/30, 100) with 5-mm slices oriented in an oblique coronal plane perpendicular to the glenohumeral joint. The MR studies were initially interpreted without knowledge of the results of other diagnostic procedures. The MR diagnosis of cuff tear was made when irregularity, discontinuity, and increased signal were identified in the rotator cuff. MR images showed tears in 10 patients (32%) and were negative for tear in 21 patients (68%). MR correlated with arthroscopy and arthrography in 17 of 18 normal patients, in eight of 10 patients with complete tears, and in one of three patients with partial tears. For complete rotator cuff tears, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 80%, 94%, and 89%, respectively. For all tears (partial and complete), the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69%, 94%, and 84%, respectively. These data suggest that MR imaging is an accurate procedure for the diagnosis of complete rotator cuff tears. The number of partial tears (three) in this series is too small to evaluate the value of MR imaging in the diagnosis of partial tears.
对31例有症状的患者进行了磁共振成像(MR)检查,以评估肩部MR在诊断肩袖撕裂中的敏感性和特异性。相关研究包括对19例患者进行关节镜检查以及对12例患者进行关节造影。使用自旋回波脉冲序列(650 - 850/30 [TR, TE]、2000/30、100),在0.5T或1.5T飞利浦超导磁体上获取图像,5mm厚的层面沿垂直于盂肱关节的斜冠状面定位。MR研究最初在不知其他诊断程序结果的情况下进行解读。当在肩袖中发现不规则、连续性中断及信号增强时,做出肩袖撕裂的MR诊断。MR图像显示10例患者(32%)存在撕裂,21例患者(68%)未发现撕裂。在18例正常患者中的17例、10例完全撕裂患者中的8例以及3例部分撕裂患者中的1例中,MR与关节镜检查和关节造影结果相关。对于完全性肩袖撕裂,敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为80%、94%和89%。对于所有撕裂(部分和完全),敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为69%、94%和84%。这些数据表明,MR成像对于诊断完全性肩袖撕裂是一种准确的检查方法。本系列中部分撕裂的病例数(3例)太少,无法评估MR成像在诊断部分撕裂中的价值。