Suppr超能文献

用成骨和抗吸收治疗治疗绝经后骨质疏松症:联合和序贯方法。

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bone-forming and antiresorptive treatments: Combined and sequential approaches.

机构信息

Aarhus University Hospital, Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Palle Juul Jensen Boulevard 115, DK8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Bone. 2020 Oct;139:115516. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115516. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

Abstract

Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the most commonly used antiresorptive therapies. Despite differences in the increase in bone mineral density seen with these drugs, the reductions in fracture risk are similar; 50-70%, 20%, and 40% for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, respectively. The bone-forming treatments; teriparatide and abaloparatide increase bone mineral density more than the antiresorptives and the reductions in fracture risk are 85% and 40-50% for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively, compared to placebo. The VERO study demonstrated a >50% reduction in vertebral and clinical fractures in women treated with teriparatide compared to risedronate. The dual-action treatment; romosozumab leads to more pronounced increases in BMD than other treatment modalities and reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures by 73% and 36% compared to placebo after 12 months and the sequential treatment regime; romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate reduced the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures by 48%, 20% and 38%, respectively compared to alendronate after 2-3 years. The evidence for combination therapy targeting both resorption and formation is limited as only short-term studies with BMD as the endpoint have been performed. All bone-forming and dual-action treatments increase BMD and reduce the fracture risk, however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only temporary and should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The sequence of treatment matters as the BMD response to teriparatide is reduced in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with risedronate seems to be preserved after bisphosphonate therapy. The DATA study suggested that transitioning from denosumab to teriparatide is problematic due to the increase in bone resorption occurring after stopping denosumab. Studies have shown further improvements in BMD when transitioning from oral bisphosphonates to zoledronic acid or denosumab. Management of osteoporosis will in many patients include a long-term treatment plan. This will often include sequential therapy which in severe cases preferably should start with bone-forming followed by antiresorptive treatment. The severity of osteoporosis, reaching a treatment goal, and responding to treatment failure are important factors determining the treatment sequence in the individual patient.

摘要

治疗骨质疏松症的有效疗法已经问世。双磷酸盐和地舒单抗是最常用的抗吸收疗法。尽管这些药物在增加骨密度方面存在差异,但骨折风险的降低是相似的;分别为椎体、非椎体和髋部骨折的 50-70%、20%和 40%。骨形成治疗药物;特立帕肽和abaloparatide 增加骨密度的效果超过抗吸收剂,与安慰剂相比,椎体和非椎体骨折的骨折风险降低分别为 85%和 40-50%。VERO 研究表明,与利塞膦酸盐相比,特立帕肽治疗的女性椎体和临床骨折减少>50%。双作用治疗药物;romosozumab 导致骨密度的增加比其他治疗方式更为明显,与安慰剂相比,12 个月后椎体和临床骨折的风险降低 73%和 36%,而 12 个月的序贯治疗方案;romosozumab 治疗 12 个月后改用阿仑膦酸钠,与 2-3 年后的阿仑膦酸钠相比,椎体、非椎体和髋部骨折的风险分别降低 48%、20%和 38%。针对吸收和形成的联合治疗的证据有限,因为只有以骨密度为终点的短期研究。所有骨形成和双作用治疗都能增加骨密度并降低骨折风险,但随着时间的推移,这种效果会逐渐减弱,因此治疗只是暂时的,随后应使用双磷酸盐或地舒单抗进行抗吸收治疗。治疗顺序很重要,因为以前接受过双磷酸盐治疗的患者,特立帕肽的骨密度反应会降低;然而,根据 VERO 试验的结果,与利塞膦酸盐相比,骨形成治疗的抗骨折疗效似乎在双磷酸盐治疗后得到保留。DATA 研究表明,由于停用地舒单抗后骨吸收增加,从地舒单抗转为特立帕肽存在问题。研究表明,从口服双磷酸盐转为唑来膦酸或地舒单抗时,骨密度会进一步提高。许多患者的骨质疏松症管理将包括长期治疗计划。这通常包括序贯治疗,在严重情况下,最好从骨形成开始,然后进行抗吸收治疗。骨质疏松症的严重程度、达到治疗目标和对治疗失败的反应是决定个体患者治疗顺序的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验