Jeon Minjeong, De Boeck Paul, Li Xiangrui, Lu Zhong-Lin
Department of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, 3141 Moore Hall, 457 Portola Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
Ohio State University, Los Angeles, USA.
Psychometrika. 2020 Jun;85(2):398-436. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09710-9. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
Theory of mind (ToM) is an essential social-cognitive ability to understand one's own and other people's mental states. Neural data as well as behavior data have been utilized in ToM research, but the two types of data have rarely been analyzed together, creating a large gap in the literature. In this paper, we propose and apply a novel joint modeling approach to analyze brain activations with two types of behavioral data, response times and response accuracy, obtained from a multi-item ToM assessment, with the intention to shed new light on the nature of the underlying process of ToM reasoning. Our trivariate data analysis suggested that different levels or kinds of processes might be involved during the ToM assessment, which seem to differ in terms of cognitive efficiency and sensitivity to ToM items and the correctness of item responses. Additional details on the trivariate data analysis results are provided with discussions on their implications for ToM research.
心理理论(ToM)是一种理解自己和他人心理状态的重要社会认知能力。神经数据以及行为数据已被用于ToM研究,但这两种类型的数据很少被一起分析,这在文献中造成了很大的差距。在本文中,我们提出并应用一种新颖的联合建模方法,来分析从多项目ToM评估中获得的两种行为数据(反应时间和反应准确性)与大脑激活情况,旨在为ToM推理潜在过程的本质提供新的见解。我们的三变量数据分析表明,在ToM评估过程中可能涉及不同层次或类型的过程,这些过程在认知效率、对ToM项目的敏感性以及项目反应的正确性方面似乎有所不同。文中还提供了三变量数据分析结果的更多细节,并讨论了它们对ToM研究的意义。